Key Takeaways: Nuclear Communities Economic Resilience Conference

In the Wake of Operational Uncertainty, Nuclear Host Communities are Planning for a Resilient Future

Guest Post from Megan Wright, Economic Development Associate, Smart Growth America. This post was originally featured here.

Conference participants work together in small group sessions to brainstorm economic resilience implementation plans.

At the 2022 Nuclear Communities Economic Resilience Conference held November 16-17, host communities from nine nuclear plants in the Midwest – the region that hosts more than half of the nation’s nuclear fleet – gathered to share experiences, best practices, and plan for the future. The Nuclear Communities Team– a technical assistance group funded by the U.S. Economic Development Administration and led by Smart Growth America in partnership with the Nuclear Decommissioning Collaborative, the Center for Creative Land Recycling, and the National Association of Development Organizations Research Foundation, traveled to Morris, IL, a small town about an hour outside of Chicago, to convene representatives of nuclear host communities from across the Midwest.

What We Heard: Common Themes & Challenges

The conference was held in wake of renewed interest in nuclear power and its role in facilitating the nation’s transition to renewable energy. Midwestern states more than half of the nation’s nuclear fleet, with six active stations in Illinois alone. Participants recognized that energy transition and industry uncertainty is a reality and saw the value in preparing for a range of possible operating scenarios to bolster economic resilience. Throughout the event, the following themes surfaced:

Employment Contribution

Each nuclear host community and region is home to hundreds of nuclear plant workers and their families. For example, the Dresden nuclear plant provides Grundy County and adjacent communities in Illinois with approximately 800 full-time jobs; the Palisades nuclear plant provides 600 local jobs in rural Michigan. Both of these plants contribute hundreds of secondary and tertiary jobs to their respective regions. When a plant closes, many workers relocate, creating a sizable local and regional impact.

Socioeconomic Impact

Typically, the lifespan of a nuclear power plant is measured in decades, with the average operational life of a plant exceeding 40 years. Nuclear plants provide millions of dollars in taxes to local governments, often making up more than half of their total yearly budget. Some plants may also have a substantial impact on local school districts. For example, The Reed-Cook School District draws over 70% of its yearly budget from the Braidwood nuclear plant’s tax payments. Another economic impact of a plant on its host community is the wages it pays its workers. In Ottawa, IL, only 25 local residents work at the Dresden nuclear power plant, but they bring in a cumulative $2.5 million in wages to the community every year.

Volatility in the Energy Industry

It’s been difficult for host communities to know when their plant will close or understand how the decommissioning and closure process works. This uncertainty makes it challenging for a community to plan for their long-term economic health and makes planning intimidating as no one wants to think about their plant closing, and public opinion can vary greatly. Often, there is pushback against planning for the future if the public feels that planning for closure will encourage the utility to prematurely shut down a plant.

Capacity Issues

Small towns are just that: small. Their size is part of their charm and tight-knit community feel, but it also contributes to capacity issues. To that end, there is a clear need for economic development specialists in nuclear host communities to help them conduct economic impact analyses, complete grant applications, and assist in relationship-building with their plant operator. Nuclear power is a complex industry that often leaves communities in the dark when it comes to land assessments, tax valuations, and contract negotiations. Additionally, there is no standardized method for assessing the value of a nuclear power plant, resulting in community-specific tax agreements or litigation.

Regional development organizations can be key partners for local communities that need help writing grants and carrying them out, collecting data, and convening partners to support economic development planning efforts. For example, the North Central Illinois Council of Governments is serving as a project partner and grant administrator for an EDA-funded grant to the Grundy County Economic Development Council and the Grundy County Chamber of Commerce. The grant will help Grundy County develop and implement a resiliency and diversification strategy for the area.

The Nuclear Communities Team is funded by US EDA and consists of staff from Smart Growth America, the Nuclear Decommissioning Collaborative, Center for Creative Land Recycling, and the NADO Research Foundation. Photo credit: Monica Schild.

Moving Forward: Opportunities & Planning for the Future

Although the impacts of energy transition and possible nuclear plant closure can be challenging for host communities, the closure of a plant doesn’t mean that a community no longer has a future. With the right planning and resources, there are many opportunities for host communities to have a leading role in planning their economic resilience and diversification to build continued economic prosperity. For example, one of the main opportunities that comes with plant closure is in the community’s existing workforce. This niche industry carries a unique set of skills that are highly marketable and can be used to attract other industries like engineering firms, medical technologies and equipment repair, and security operations. Additionally, funding opportunities for nuclear host communities, regardless of the stage of their plant’s operation, are available through legislation like the Infrastructure Reduction Act (IRA) on the national level and state-level programs such as the Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) in Illinois. These grant programs can be used to support existing nuclear facilities, but also to invest in new nuclear technologies like small modular reactors (SMRs).

A common thread among participants at the conference was their love for their communities. Nuclear power plants forever change the community they are in, whether the plant is open, in the process of decommissioning, or permanently closed. To maintain the unique and wonderful elements in their communities, local leaders, the utility, and community members need to work together to ensure a sustainable, resilient ecosystem is constructed to economically support each nuclear host community for years to come.

To learn more about the resources to support nuclear host communities and training/technical assistance opportunities from the Nuclear Communities Team, click here.

Special thanks to Nancy Norton and Monica Schild from the Grundy County Economic Development Council, and Mayor Chris Brown of Morris, IL for generously hosting the Conference.

This work utilizes Federal funds under award ED20HDQ3030068 from the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), U.S. Department of Commerce. The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the project team and do not necessarily reflect the view of the EDA or the U.S. Department of Commerce.


Applications cannot be saved and returned to at a later time. It is recommended you compile all of your information in advance in a word processor and cut and paste into the application below.

2023 Impact Awards

The primary applicant must be a NADO member. Project partners, both NADO and non-members, can be recognized under "Project Partners" below.

Primary Project Contact:
This person will be the designated point of contact for all future awards-related correspondence.

Organization Address

Project Location (if different from Organization Address)

Executive Director

Additional Organizational Information
Please upload your organization's logo which will be included on the winning project award certificate.

Project Information
This title will be printed on the award certificate for winning projects and in all 2022 NADO Impact Award materials and cannot be changed.

Project Summary & Questions
Please craft clear, thoughtful, and engaging responses to the following questions. Use the following sections to tell us how your project has made an impact, such as its use of creative funding mechanisms, efforts to create efficiencies or reduce costs, unique partnership models, and emphasis on building resilience and/or enhancing your region's quality of life.

For award-winning projects, the information provided below may be used verbatim to inform project descriptions that will be published in the 2023 NADO Impact Awards materials and included on the NADO website.

Please submit at least one photo showing your project in action. Please keep file size to a minimum (<2Mb) and use JPEG format. If uploading multiple files, ZIP files prior to submitting. If you have trouble uploading images they can be directly emailed to Brett Schwartz at [email protected] Include the project title they correspond to in the subject line of your email.

Note: Submitted photos may be used in NADO Impact Awards materials and in other NADO published materials with credit to your organization. Please also consider submitting photos for NADO's 2023 Photo Contest, which will be held this summer.

Your application is not submitted until you are directed to a confirmation page. If you have any questions or are unsure if your application has been submitted, please contact Brett Schwartz at [email protected]

Contact Melissa Levy

Contact Krishna Kunapareddy

Contact Andrew Coker

Contact Laura Gale

Contact Katie Allison

Contact Jack Morgan

Content Questions Form

Registration Questions Form

Hotel Questions Form

New Speaker Inquiry

Job Listing Inquiry

Joe McKinney serves as Executive Director of the National Association of Development Organizations (NADO). Headquartered in Washington DC, NADO provides advocacy, education, research, and training for the nation’s 500+ regional planning and development organizations.

Joe has thirty-one years of experience having served in city, county, regional, national association, and government management since 1991. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Public Policy Analysis from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and is a candidate for a master’s degree in Public Administration from UNC-Chapel Hill.

McKinney has provided congressional testimony on numerous occasions regarding the importance of regional development organizations in helping shape the nation’s economic growth. He is nationally recognized for promoting innovative solutions in areas such as planning and economic development, workforce development, transportation and transit, and aging services.

Contact Danny Tomares

Contact Dion Thompson-Davoli

Contact Ciara Ristig

Contact Bret Allphin

Contact Brett Schwartz

Contact Carrie Kissel

Contact Scott Brown

Contact Jamie McCormick

Contact Joe McKinney

Contact Krystal De Leon

Contact Brittany Salazar

Contact Laurie Thompson

Contact Mirielle Burgoyne