<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NADO.org &#187; Pennsylvania</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nado.org/tag/pennsylvania/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nado.org</link>
	<description>National Association of Development Organizations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 18:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=231</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vibrant Rural Communities: Lewistown, Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.nado.org/vibrant-rural-communities-lewistown-pennsylvania/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vibrant-rural-communities-lewistown-pennsylvania</link>
		<comments>http://www.nado.org/vibrant-rural-communities-lewistown-pennsylvania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Nothstine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional and Community Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vibrant rural communities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nado.org/?p=5741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case study was researched and written by Parrish Bergquist, NADO Research Foundation Graduate Fellow.
In the mid-1990s, Tom Grbenick with the <a href="http://www.seda-cog.org/Pages/Home.aspx"   target="_blank" >SEDA-Council of Governments...</a> (SEDA-COG) received a call from a banker who wanted to discuss revitalizing downtown Lewistown, Pennsylvania.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #999999;"><em>This case study was researched and written by Parrish Bergquist, NADO Research Foundation Graduate Fellow.</em></span></p>
<p>In the mid-1990s, Tom Grbenick with the <a href="http://www.seda-cog.org/Pages/Home.aspx"   target="_blank" >SEDA-Council of Governments</a> (SEDA-COG) received a call from a banker who wanted to discuss revitalizing downtown Lewistown, Pennsylvania. Following their conversation, Grbenick initiated a downtown planning process, but merchants showed little interest in the initiative. Changing tacks, SEDA-COG led a regional planning process to explore relevant issues in Lewistown Borough and five neighboring municipalities whose residents consider Lewistown their hometown. Grbenick recalls, “What was the key issue to emerge during the regional planning process? Concern about the demise of downtown Lewistown.” Grbenick and his staff at SEDA-COG channeled that interest into a downtown visioning process, aided by support from local legislators, and this time captured the enthusiasm of downtown merchants.</p>
<div id="attachment_5769" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-aerial.jpg"   ><img class="size-medium wp-image-5769" title="lewistown aerial" alt="" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-aerial-300x109.jpg" width="300" height="109" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Two companies donated land to allow for the extension of Montgomery Avenue, offering a much-improved entryway into one of Lewistown’s major parks (click to enlarge) (source: DLI, Inc.).</p></div>
<p>Supported by a grant from the <a href="http://www.arc.gov/index.asp"   target="_blank" >Appalachian Regional Commission</a>, SEDA-COG, the Lewistown Borough, and other stakeholders organized a downtown revitalization task force. They drafted a strategy and prepared a successful application to the <a href="http://www.newpa.com/find-and-apply-for-funding/funding-and-program-finder/main-street-program"   target="_blank" >Pennsylvania Main Street Program</a>, which provided funding for five years of downtown revitalization. In 1998, <a href="http://www.downtownlewistown.com/"   target="_blank" >Downtown Lewistown, Inc.</a> (DLI) was formed to spearhead redevelopment efforts, and in 2000, the partners adopted <a href="http://crc.sedacog.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=oZqRPYtHO5Q%3D&amp;tabid=99"   target="_blank" >Coming Home: The Charter Plan for Downtown Lewistown</a>. In 2007, Lewistown joined the <a href="http://www.newpa.com/find-and-apply-for-funding/funding-and-program-finder/elm-street"   target="_blank" >Pennsylvania Elm Street Program</a>, which targets residential neighborhoods bordering downtowns. The program operates under the principle that vibrant neighborhoods surrounding downtowns contribute to the central business district’s vitality.</p>
<div>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-key-facts1.jpg"   ><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-5792" title="lewistown key facts" alt="" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-key-facts1-300x272.jpg" width="300" height="272" /></a></p>
<p>Since revitalization efforts began, public and private entities have re-used vacant structures, renovated public and private buildings, redeveloped former industrial sites, improved public spaces, and attracted new businesses to a transformed   downtown. Revitalization began with the conversion of a closed department store into the Mifflin County Regional Business Center, a project that demonstrates Lewistown’s success at forging public-private partnerships. Working with DLI’s predecessor organization—the Greater Lewistown Corporation—SEDA-COG developed a study and proposal for the 54,000 square-foot building’s adaptive re-use.  Tenant leases funded the operations, with Lewistown Hospital committing initially to lease 10,000 square feet of space for off campus mental health services along with Penn State and Cooperative Extension Service. Later, Mifflin County located various offices in the new center. By 2003, over 100 employees worked in the building, which has maintained about 95% occupancy (data source: <a href="http://www.downtownlewistown.com/index.php?option=com_docman&amp;Itemid=175"   target="_blank" >DLI 2003 Annual Report</a>).</p>
<p>Public and private investment has continued through the years, expanding the available office and commercial space available in downtown Lewistown. For example, a private developer invested $2.5 million to convert an abandoned warehouse into the Community Partners Allied in Social Services (COMPASS) building. The Mifflin County Industrial Development Corporation (MCIDC) helped finance the project with tax-exempt industrial development bonds. The building houses about 75 employees, working for a variety of drug abuse, rehabilitation, and community health organizations. These workers enjoy easy access to Lewistown’s riverwalk, parks, and downtown amenities (see <a href="http://www.downtownlewistown.com/index.php?option=com_docman&amp;Itemid=175"   target="_blank" >DLI 2009 Annual Report</a>).</p>
<div id="attachment_5752" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-images-1.jpg"   ><img class="size-medium wp-image-5752" title="lewistown images 1" alt="" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-images-1-300x218.jpg" width="300" height="218" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A private developer&#8211;using financing from tax-exempt industrial development bonds&#8211;invested $2.5 million to convert an abandoned warehouse in to the COMPASS building, which houses about 75 employees working for a variety of community organizations (source: DLI, Inc.).</p></div>
<p>The County also obtained $1.9 million from the State of Pennsylvania to rehabilitate its historic courthouse, and $15.4 million to build a new correctional facility. According to DLI’s Executive Director Jim Zubler, the expansion of office space downtown has created a consumer base for downtown businesses: “Employees frequent downtown during lunch hours, utilizing the facilities of town.” From 1999 to 2009, Lewistown saw 150,000 square feet of vacant space filled and four “’white elephant’ buildings” rehabilitated. Two hundred new jobs were created and 35 new businesses opened (and remained open) in the downtown (<a href="http://www.downtownlewistown.com/index.php?option=com_docman&amp;Itemid=175"   target="_blank" >DLI 2009 Annual Report</a>).</p>
<p>Public funding has contributed to Lewistown’s revitalization, but the Borough has done an exemplary job of matching government dollars with private investment. For example, the Design Challenge Grant Program funded by the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development helped fund façade improvements for downtown commercial buildings. Over ten years, the program provided over $75,312 for 32 projects, matched by $556,890 of private investment.</p>
<div id="attachment_5767" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 256px"><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-images-2.jpg"   ><img class="size-medium wp-image-5767" title="lewistown images 2" alt="" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-images-2-246x300.jpg" width="246" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Design Challenge Grant Program helped pay for facade improvements at 5 East Third Street in downtown Lewistown. The Program provided over $75,000 for facade improvements downntown, matched by $633,202 in private investment (source: DLI, Inc.).</p></div>
<p>Helping to foster a vibrant and livable downtown environment, the Borough and County have directed $3.4 million in local, State, and Federal funding for streetscape improvements, $300,000 for a new street expansion project, $130,000 for the first segment of a riverwalk with provisions for bike and pedestrian trails, $1.5 million to upgrade street running railroad track including rail stabilization, water line replacement and street reconstruction. They have directed $1.1 million in the construction of a new community center and $30 million in new upgrades to the waste water treatment facility meeting Chesapeake Bay regulations serving the Greater Lewistown area (<em>source: Jim Zubler, DLI, Inc.</em>).</p>
<p>Local residents and businesses have contributed to these projects.  For example, local property owners paid the engineering costs for the Monument Square streetscape improvement project, and Omega Bank, now First National Bank, donated land for the riverwalk project. Two companies donated parcels of land that allowed the Borough to create a new street offering a much-improved entryway into one of its major parks.</p>
<p>One cornerstone project reaching completion is Mann Edge Terrace, a 31-unit elderly housing project set to open this fall on a former brownfield site in the “Elm Street” neighborhood. MCIDC, working with the multi-county SEDA-COG Housing Development Corporation, channeled $5.5 million in private tax credits, federal, and state funds to a former manufacturing site immediately adjacent to the downtown.  Zubler notes, “We’ve enjoyed good success through joint interworking of the public and private sectors, helping to provide the incentives, and helping to see projects through.”</p>
<p>Zubler credits Lewistown’s revival to public entities’ support and to a strong private-sector investment culture. Anticipating a tight fiscal future, he believes the community must devise creative ways to foster investment and cultivate public-private partnerships. DLI’s organizational structure provides a good example. Throughout the Main Street and Elm Street Programs’ implementation, the State of Pennsylvania, local governments, and businesses have provided significant financial support to DLI. With the exhaustion of Elm Street Program funding in 2013, the full budgetary burden will fall on local entities. To meet these new challenges, DLI is transitioning into a new county-wide organization, and it has already secured pledges from local governments, businesses, and industry groups to support its operations.</p>
<div id="attachment_5770" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-3.jpg" style="color: #ff4b33;"   ><img class="size-medium wp-image-5770" title="lewistown 3" alt="" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/lewistown-3-300x231.jpg" width="300" height="231" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fountain Square Park will serve as the anchor for the East End, a residential neighborhood near downtown where Lewistown is focusing Elm Street Program revitalization efforts (source: DLI, Inc.).</p></div>
<p>Zubler believes that the new organization will build on two decades of comprehensive but focused community revitalization. Returning to the program’s genesis in regional planning, the new organization’s county-wide focus will make Lewistown and Mifflin County competitive as a complement to nearby employment centers. Zubler says, “If we continue to revitalize the community one house, block, and neighborhood at a time, it will be a very good day going forward.”</p>
<p>~~</p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;"><em>This is part of the NADO Research Foundation’s <a href="http://www.nado.org/vibrant-rural-communities-case-study-series/"   target="_blank" ><span style="color: #999999;">Vibrant Rural Communities</span></a> series of case studies, which describes how rural regions and small towns across the country are growing local and regional economies and creating stronger communities. This series shows how communities can leverage a wide range of tools and resources to build on their assets, protect their resources, and make strategic investments that offer long-term benefits.</em></span></p>
<p><em>This project is based in part upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under Agreement No. DTFH61-10-C-00047. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FHWA or the NADO Research Foundation.</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nado.org/vibrant-rural-communities-lewistown-pennsylvania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Project Prioritization: Case Study: North Central Pennsylvania’s Project Prioritization Process</title>
		<link>http://www.nado.org/project-prioritization-case-study-north-central-pennsylvanias-project-prioritization-process/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=project-prioritization-case-study-north-central-pennsylvanias-project-prioritization-process</link>
		<comments>http://www.nado.org/project-prioritization-case-study-north-central-pennsylvanias-project-prioritization-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 21:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Kissel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nado.org/?p=5324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 2007 – 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission set out to “define and develop a regional core transportation system that connects local and regional facilities with the state’s system and...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 2007 – 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), North Central Pennsylvania Regional Planning and Development Commission set out to “define and develop a regional core transportation system that connects local and regional facilities with the state’s system and coordinates with other community initiatives and priorities.” (<a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5331#sources"   >7</a>) The regional core system is used with defined selection criteria to rigorously analyze projects for inclusion in planning documents. To create project selection criteria, North Central benchmarked other counterpart planning regions for applicable developments.</p>
<p>They found that a project prioritization process is especially useful when funding is limited. One of the previous limitations of the region’s LRTP, Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (or CEDS, a document required by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration through its planning grant program) and Regional Action Strategy (developed through the state’s integrated Land Use, Transportation, and Economic Development, or LUTED, initiative) was the failure to identify spatial priorities—<em>where</em> in a large region a few affordable and targeted  investments should be made. The most important economic and transportation centers are identified by the core system. The core system follows the model of the Pennsylvania Mobility Plan as a tool to consider multi-modal interconnection, the flow of goods and people in the region, and integrated investments.</p>
<p>In December 2008, a Project Prioritization Committee was formed, bringing together a variety of regional stakeholders from the RPO and CEDS committees to develop and weight selection criteria. To assist with weighting, North Central utilized dynamic software called Decision Lens, through a statewide license purchased by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT). Developed to improve capital resource planning and decision making, Decision Lens software allowed for pairwise comparisons of each proposed criterion. Various sets of project criteria and weighting were developed for each project funding area. In a second round of review, all projects are then examined against “Overall Transportation Criteria” for a total score. These criteria include 14 elements in five basic groupings of (in order of importance): safety; job creation and community benefits; transportation planning and project support; project location factors; and transportation benefits. This process will be used beginning with the 2011 TIP.</p>
<p>A similar process is used for North Central’s economic and community development projects under consideration for inclusion in their region’s CEDS. The Project Prioritization Committee’s role will continue to evaluate candidate Projects of Regional Significance and forward recommendations to North Central’s executive board.</p>
<p>North Central’s planning process will continue to evolve through both region-specific and statewide efforts.  For example, the state’s RPOs, MPOs, and PennDOT are all working together to identify the most important indicators to track regarding preservation of the existing system, an effort that began in 2011.  Preservation has been identified as a priority in the state’s long-range plan.  These indicators will help the state to better program funds dedicated to preservation and to justify its overall investments in the transportation system.</p>
<p>For more information, visit <a href="http://www.ncentral.com/index.php?page=transportation"   >www.ncentral.com/index.php?page=transportation</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/transportation-project-prioritization-and-performance-based-planning-efforts-in-rural-and-small-metropolitan-regions/"   >Return to Report Overview</a> | <a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5328"   >Next &gt;&gt; Case Study: Flexible Process Enables Yakima Valley Region to Quickly Respond to Changing Priorities</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nado.org/project-prioritization-case-study-north-central-pennsylvanias-project-prioritization-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transportation Project Prioritization and Performance-based Planning Efforts in Rural and Small Metropolitan Regions</title>
		<link>http://www.nado.org/transportation-project-prioritization-and-performance-based-planning-efforts-in-rural-and-small-metropolitan-regions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=transportation-project-prioritization-and-performance-based-planning-efforts-in-rural-and-small-metropolitan-regions</link>
		<comments>http://www.nado.org/transportation-project-prioritization-and-performance-based-planning-efforts-in-rural-and-small-metropolitan-regions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Kissel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nado.org/?p=3322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5216"   ></a>In September 2011, the NADO Research Foundation released the new report <a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/RPOprioritization.pdf"   target="_blank" >Transportation Project Prioritization and Performance-based Planning Efforts in Rural and Small Metropolitan Regions...</a> (PDF).  This report provides an overview of the state of the practice in non-metro regional transportation]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5216"   ><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5359" title="transportation project prioritization cover" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/project-prioritization-cover-233x300.jpg" alt="Cover of report" width="233" height="300" /></a>In September 2011, the NADO Research Foundation released the new report <a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/RPOprioritization.pdf"   target="_blank" >Transportation Project Prioritization and Performance-based Planning Efforts in Rural and Small Metropolitan Regions</a> (PDF).  This report provides an overview of the state of the practice in non-metro regional transportation planning, including the contract amounts, RPO tasks, and committee structures.  The research also examines rural long-range planning efforts and criteria used to rank regional priority projects.  With case studies on the statewide and regional planning processes in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington, the document provides examples for rural and small metro regions looking to formalize their planning process.</p>
<p>This work is supported by the Federal Highway Administration under contract number DTFH61-10-00033. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FHWA or the NADO Research Foundation.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/RPOprioritization.pdf"   target="_blank" >View the entire report here</a> (PDF) in a downloadable or printable format, or use the links below to read specific sections.</p>
<h3>Table of Contents</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5216"   >Report Introduction</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5233"   >RPO Characteristics</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5286"   >Rural Transportation Leadership</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5293"   >Planning Tools and Techniques</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5297"   >Regional Transportation Planning Activities</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5300"   >Regional Long-range Transportation Plans</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5307"   >Spotlight: Virginia’s Statewide and Rural Long-range Plans</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5313"   >Spotlight: Kentucky’s Regional Concept Plans</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5318"   >Statewide and Regional Transportation Improvement Programs</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5321"   >Case Study: North Carolina Develops Statewide Performance-based Prioritization Process</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5324"   >Case Study: North Central Pennsylvania’s Project Prioritization Process</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5328"   >Case Study: Flexible Process Enables Yakima Valley Region to Quickly Respond to Changing Priorities</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/?p=5331"   >Conclusions</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://get.adobe.com/reader"   target="_blank" >To view PDF files, use Adobe Reader.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nado.org/transportation-project-prioritization-and-performance-based-planning-efforts-in-rural-and-small-metropolitan-regions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural Gas Drilling</title>
		<link>http://www.nado.org/natural-gas/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=natural-gas</link>
		<comments>http://www.nado.org/natural-gas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 21:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NADO Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Economic Development Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nado.org/?p=1511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ruraltransportation.org/uploads/naturalgas.pdf"   >...</a>Natural Gas Drilling in the Marcellus Shale: Economic Opportunities and Infrastructure Challenges. This issue brief examines the natural gas drilling boom in the U.S. and associated economic opportunities and infrastructure challenges, including strains on local transportation networks and other types]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.ruraltransportation.org/uploads/naturalgas.pdf"   ><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2770" title="Marcellus Drilling Cover Page" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Marcellus-Drilling-Cover-Page-231x300.jpg" alt="" width="139" height="180" /></a>Natural Gas Drilling in the Marcellus Shale: Economic Opportunities and Infrastructure Challenges. </strong>This issue brief examines the natural gas drilling boom in the U.S. and associated economic opportunities and infrastructure challenges, including strains on local transportation networks and other types of infrastructure as well as environmental impact concerns. The publication explores how regional development organizations in Pennsylvania and New York are addressing these challenges, and what sort of measures can be taken to ensure that natural gas extraction brings the best possible benefits to regions and communities, while minimizing potential negative effects.</p>
<p>(May 2010, 16 pages): <a href="http://www.ruraltransportation.org/uploads/naturalgas.pdf"   >View the report</a> (PDF)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nado.org/natural-gas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Integrating Land Use, Transportation and Economic Development in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.nado.org/integrating-land-use-transportation-and-economic-development-in-pennsylvania/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=integrating-land-use-transportation-and-economic-development-in-pennsylvania</link>
		<comments>http://www.nado.org/integrating-land-use-transportation-and-economic-development-in-pennsylvania/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Nothstine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional and Community Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional and Community Planning Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nado.org/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/NADO-LUTED-Report_Final_lo-res.pdf"   target="_blank" >...</a>Pennsylvania initiated a statewide effort to integrate land use, transportation and economic development at the regional level through a process known as LUTED, under which the state’s regional planning and development organizations developed regional visions and strategies to identify projects]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/NADO-LUTED-Report_Final_lo-res.pdf"   target="_blank" ><img class="size-medium wp-image-896 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="NADO LUTED Report" src="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/NADO-LUTED-Report-July-2010-cover-231x300.jpg" alt="NADO LUTED Report" width="130" height="168" /></a>Pennsylvania initiated a statewide effort to integrate land use, transportation and economic development at the regional level through a process known as LUTED, under which the state’s regional planning and development organizations developed regional visions and strategies to identify projects related to multiple issue areas.</p>
<p>In April 2010, the NADO Research Foundation held a Peer Exchange event in Pennsylvania to learn more about this effort. At this event, a group of transportation planning practitioners from rural and small metropolitan regions across the nation visited three regional planning and economic development organizations based in Pennsylvania: the Southern Alleghenies Planning and Development Commission, SEDA-Council of Governments and Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission. This proceedings report describes the background of regional planning and the LUTED process in Pennsylvania, and provides case studies of how the three organizations observed on the Peer Exchange approached the integration of land use, transportation and economic development planning in their regions.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/NADO-LUTED-Report_Final_lo-res.pdf"   >NADO LUTED Report</a> (PDF)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nado.org/integrating-land-use-transportation-and-economic-development-in-pennsylvania/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>