Linda Giltz, Senior Planner at Land-of-Sky Regional Council discussed the North Carolina Small Towns Economic Prosperity Program (NC STEP), a state effort to help small towns reinvigorate their economies through a combination of coaching, training, technical assistance, and grants. Small group discussions covered coaching and training local partners to maintain momentum and implement projects over the long-term.

Click here to download the Powerpoint presentation (PDF)
Click here to download session worksheet (PDF)

The ranking process works as follows: projects are sorted by goal and then by transportation tier—statewide, regional, and subregional—within each goal.  A project’s total score combines quantitative data, qualitative data, and multimodal points.  For the first version of Prioritization (referred to as “P1.0”), quantitative data points accounted for the majority of a project’s total score and were based on crash rates, capacity/traffic counts, and pavement conditions.  Qualitative points were assigned based on a top 25 ranking by each MPO, RPO, and NCDOT Division Office (Figure 13 shows the state’s 17 MPOs and 20 RPOs; 14 NCDOT field or Division offices work with the regional partners).  In this manner, the new process, says Patel, “provides a balanced picture of projects scores reflecting both data and local interest throughout the state.”

Finally, SPOT awards multimodal “bonus” points to highway projects that encourage efficient connections between transportation modes.  The three tiers within each goal category address the different transportation needs and interests of urban and rural areas.  Quantitative data points are weighed more heavily for higher-tier statewide projects, and decrease for regional and subregional tier projects.  Local input points are weighed more heavily for subregional tier projects, and decrease for regional and statewide projects.

According to Patel, in P1.0 the state and regional/local partners found their priorities were generally in alignment.  Patel says that the majority of MPOs and RPOs support the new statewide prioritization process; however, some of the larger MPOs found the exercise a burden due to the challenge of satisfying a large number of municipalities within a top 25 ranking process.  Following the qualitative input of MPO and RPO partners, SPOT finalized project rankings and published results for both partner and public consumption.  These results are also forwarded to a separate NCDOT division for programming projects based on funding allocations and eligibility.  This input helps drive the creation of NCDOT’s 10-Year Work Program and STIP.

Within the last year, SPOT has continued to reach out to its partners to improve the project prioritization process. According to Patel, the initial selection of quantitative criteria for Prioritization 1.0 flowed easily from NCDOT’s goals.  A work group (consisting of MPOs, RPOs, and other governmental agencies) was convened in 2010 and contributed to the enhancement of this criteria and helped shape the second version of Prioritization (P2.0).

In response to the input of MPO and RPO partners, Prioritization 2.0 will incorporate new criteria, including benefit/cost (measured by travel time savings) and economic competitiveness.  P2.0 will also include criteria to address modernization issues identified by partners, including sight distances and deficiencies in lane and shoulder widths.  The strategic prioritization process will formally engage planning partners every two years and will continue to be improved and refined over time.

Elements of the new process are also being employed for purposes outside of STIP preparation.  MPOs and RPOs in North Carolina prepare regional transportation improvement programs.  These processes are separately developed at the local level.  Patel says that some MPOs and RPOs have revised their regional processes to incorporate elements of the new statewide prioritization process.

North Carolina’s transportation reforms, which resulted in a new statewide project prioritization process, have been well received.  According to Patel, MPOs and RPOs are comfortable with the openness and transparency of the new process.  SPOT has heard positive feedback on the process from board members at the state level and division leadership alike.  Says Patel: “It’s a success story.” For more information, visit www.ncdot.gov/performance/reform, or view the 2012 National Rural Transportation Peer Learning Conference presentation by Alpesh Patel and Bjorn Hansen (Centralina COG/Lake Norman RPO).

Return to Report Overview | Next >> Case Study: North Central Pennsylvania’s Project Prioritization Process

This work is supported by the Federal Highway Administration under contract number DTFH61-10-00033. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FHWA or the NADO Research Foundation.

View the entire report here (PDF) in a downloadable or printable format, or use the links below to read specific sections.

Table of Contents

Report Introduction

RPO Characteristics

Rural Transportation Leadership

Planning Tools and Techniques

Regional Transportation Planning Activities

Regional Long-range Transportation Plans

• Spotlight: Virginia’s Statewide and Rural Long-range Plans
• Spotlight: Kentucky’s Regional Concept Plans

Statewide and Regional Transportation Improvement Programs

Case Study: North Carolina Develops Statewide Performance-based Prioritization Process

Case Study: North Central Pennsylvania’s Project Prioritization Process

Case Study: Flexible Process Enables Yakima Valley Region to Quickly Respond to Changing Priorities

Conclusions

To view PDF files, use Adobe Reader.

Through a keynote address and a series of panels, attendees learned about models for collaboration on planning efforts from five states: Alabama, Iowa, Missouri, North Carolina and Tennessee. Through small group discussion, attendees also engaged in further dialogue on benefits of and obstacles to collaboration, issue areas often addressed through partnerships, and institutional arrangements that facilitate relationship-building.

Released January 2011, 24 pages

Click here to view the report (PDF).

Get Adobe Reader to view PDF files here.

The NADO Research Foundation is sponsoring a two-part webinar series exploring how regional development organizations are incorporating sustainability principles into their regional planning processes.

The first webinar of the series, “Land-Based Sustainable Development Strategies in Western North Carolina”, was held on Tuesday, June 21, 2011 and featured two initiatives of the Land-of-Sky Regional Council (Asheville, NC).  Linda Giltz, AICP, Senior Planner at Land-of-Sky, described the Linking Lands and Communities Project, a four-county, multidisciplinary program to help guide land use decisions across the landscape by identifying and mapping the region’s most valuable natural and cultural resources.  Erica Anderson, AICP, also a Senior Planner at Land-of-Sky, discussed the Western North Carolina Forest Products Cooperative Marketing Project, a program that builds the capacity of forest producers to sustainably pursue a variety of forest enterprises using a bottom-up planning and economic development approach guided by forest producers and by forest product consumers.

Click here for the webinar recording (WMV).

Click here for a PDF of the presentations (PDF).

Released February 2008, 12 pages

Click here to view Tackling Regional Air Quality Issues: A Breath of Fresh Air for North Carolina Residents (PDF).

Get Adobe Reader to view PDF files here.

Click here to view Getting Started in Regional Energy and Fuels Planning: Sharing the Land-of-Sky Experience (PDF).

Get Adobe Reader to view PDF files here.