by: Laurie Thompson, Director of Programs, NADO Research Foundation
and Zanetta Doyle, Digest Editor
The health care sector accounts for up to 15 percent of
jobs in rural areas and hospitals, and are often the
second largest employer in rural counties, according to
the Rural Policy Research Institute (RUPRI). But, it
appears the business of health care is far more effective
and lucrative in urban than rural areas. According to the
National Rural Development Partnership (NRDP), residents
of rural counties generate about $66 million in health-
related expenditures, yet only 50 percent is spent locally.
The disparity between rural, urban and suburban health
care service is also evident in the quality of care
provided. A report by the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), Health, United States, 2001 with Urban
and Rural Health Chartbook, reveals that suburban
populations fare significantly better in many key health
measures than those who live in the most rural and urban
areas.
The inequity between urban and rural health care delivery
is complex. Managed care programs are not as successful
in rural areas because they are not able to secure the
critical mass needed (about 300,000 people) to be viable.
Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates are lower in
rural areas, often resulting in reduced primary care
services. Recruiting health care providers to rural
areas is difficult because of lower wages and various
quality of life factors. Rural employers are less likely
to offer private health insurance, forcing their employees
to wait longer before they seek care or to rely on
emergency rooms as their primary care provider –
increasing health care costs even more.
Regional Councils Link Health Care
and Economic Development
Quality health care service delivery is critical to
communities attracting and retaining businesses, or
promoting their areas as potential retiree locations.
Studies show that health care services are as important
as schools when businesses and industries are considering
location. Promoting health care services to recruit
businesses and new residents complements the need to
assure access to health care to current residents.
As documented by the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, rural Americans tend to be older and in poorer
health than their urban counterparts, and longer
distances to providers often mean they receive care in a
less timely fashion.
The Barren River Area Development District, an EDA funded
district located in Bowling Green, Kentucky, made a major
impact on the region’s health care system when they
donated one of their old office buildings to the city.
Today, the building houses a free clinic for local
residents. It is funded through donations raised locally
and staffed by volunteers.
Dorothy Darby-Paschall, Barren River Executive Director,
explained that the clinic, in operation since 1993,
serves uninsured, low-income residents in the community.
Patients receive basic care, including physical, dental
and eye exams, and prescription refills. Darby-Paschall
noted that there is an economic impact of healthcare not
only in her region, but nationwide. “There is a definite
economic development impact of health care in most
communities, regardless of size. In our community, the
hospital is the number one employer, as it is in many
small towns. When a hospital closes, there is an economic impact.”
HHS Taking Leadership Role on Rural Issues
In 2001, HHS established a Rural Task Force to assess
programs, learn more about rural communities and determine
how to use the information in program and policy
development. The agency’s goal is to institutionalize and
share the HHS model of including rural issues in policy/
program development with other federal agencies. HHS
cooperates with various entities to gather information
and create partnerships that help guide the department’s
planning to ensure inclusion of rural citizens. Working
closely with state, local and tribal governments, many
HHS-funded services are provided at the local level by
state, county or tribal agencies or through private
sector grantees.
The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA),
within HHS, is responsible for improving and expanding
access to quality health care for all, especially those
living in low income, uninsured, isolated populations.
HRSA provides an array of programs including grants to
rural providers aimed at expanding access to,
coordinating, restraining the cost of, and improving the
quality of essential health care in rural areas. Included
are rural health outreach, network development and a
special program to help improve the health of people who
live in the Mississippi Delta region.
Within HHS, the Office of Rural Health Policy (ORHP)
promotes state and local empowerment to meet rural health
needs through the support of state offices of rural health. I
t encourages the formation of state rural health
associations and working with a variety of state agencies
to improve rural health.
The Rural Health Research Center (RHRC) Program, which is
administered by ORHP, HRSA and HHS, was initiated in 1988
to increase the amount of high quality, policy relevant
and rural health services research conducted in the nation.
The center studies critical concerns facing rural
communities that seek to secure adequate, affordable,
high quality health services. Research findings are used
to educate national, state and local decision makers
concerned with rural health issues, bridge gaps between
policy and program needs, and to educate legislators and
policymakers. The research center has also trained many
health services researchers in rural issues.
For More Information: Visit the Rural Policy Research
Institute at www.rupri.org; The Department of Health and
Human Services at www.hhs.gov; Health Resources and
Services Administration at www.hrsa.dhhs.gov; Federal
Office of Rural Policy at www.ruralhealth.hrsa.gov;
The National Rural Health Association at www.nrharural.org.
Dismal Diagnosis for Rural Health Care
Over 400 rural hospitals have closed since 1980.
Almost 20 percent of rural Americans were uninsured in the mid 1990s.
Less than 50 percent of rural residents had private health insurance in the mid 1990s.
Fewer than 50 percent of all hospitals are located in rural areas.
Medicare and Medicaid payments account for almost 80 percent of revenues for rural hospitals.
Source: Rural Policy Research Institute, 1999.
May 2002 Index |
Next Page
NADO.org
What's New | EDFS | Job Ops | Legislative Affairs | Meetings | Membership | NADO Research Foundation | Officers and Staff | Policies and Priorities | Publications | Links | Site Map
National Association of Development Organizations
and the NADO Research Foundation
400 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 390
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 624-7806 . Fax (202) 624-8813 . info@nado.org
|