By Zanetta Doyle, Digest Editor
“Stack it deep; sell it cheap; stack it high and watch it
fly; hear those downtown merchants cry!”
(Source: walmartwatch.com)
It is Saturday morning. There’s a laundry list of things
to do. Eye doctor appointment, develop the vacation film,
fill the prescriptions, pick up groceries, and since no
one in the house cooks on Saturday, McDonalds is on the
menu tonight. Instead of running all over town, as in
times past, these errands can be accomplished today with
just one stop at the local Wal-Mart. But while the
supercenters offer convenience, opponents argue that
the ever-expanding ‘big box’ stores present economic
challenges, as they increasingly stifle the survival
of ‘mom and pop’ and main stream businesses in rural
communities.
According to a 2000 study by the Center for Applied
Economic Research, The Impact of Big Box Retail Chains
on Small Businesses, retail chains such as Wal-Mart,
K-Mart and Target have a significant impact on employment
rates, sales and the environment of small towns. In the
article, “The Case Against Sprawl,”
(excerpt from the book “Slam-Dunking Wal-Mart, by Al
Norman, 1999), Iowa State University Professor Ken Stone
examined the sales changes in Iowa small towns from 1983
to 1993 and discovered a “huge shift of sales to larger
towns and cities, with substantial amounts captured by
mass merchandise stores.”
Stone estimated that the total number of businesses lost
in small towns and rural areas was 7,326 during this time
period. Iowans spent $425 million more at discount stores,
but $153 million less at variety stores; $129 million
less at grocery stores, $94 million less at hardware
stores, $47 million less at men’s and boys apparel stores.
In the 11 store types studied, businesses lost more than
$603 million in sales. Iowa lost: 555 grocery stores;
298 hardware stores; 293 building supply stores; 161
variety stores; 158 women’s apparel stores; 153 shoe
stores; 116 drug stores; and 111 men’s and boys apparel
stores.
While this is an example of one state, the article also
explained how ‘big box’ stores have affected the
manufacturing sector throughout the U.S. Between 1973
and 1996, America lost nearly half of its apparel
manufacturing jobs. A total of 597,000 jobs were lost
during the 23-year period.
The reasons behind the big box stores’ success varies,
but the most prevalent reason is their ability to
under-price their competitors. According to an article
in Time Magazine, (Can Wal-Mart Get Any Bigger? January,
2003), Wal-Mart under-prices their supermarket
competitors by about 15 percent, in part, because
they are more efficient, but they also use non-union
labor. The article also reported that many of the
1,300 Wal-Mart supercenters were converted from
standard discount stores, offering everything from
hardware to groceries and drugs. In some cities these
stores are placed as close as five miles apart,
leaving the remaining local grocery and convenience
stores in between to struggle . “I’m not trying to be
flippant, but simply put, our long-term strategy is
to be where we’re not,” Lee Scott, Wal-Mart’s CEO
told Time.
Another challenge faced by small retailers is mega-retail
discount chains’ ability to buy directly from
manufacturers, thus in many cases, eliminating the
regional wholesaler who traditionally served the small
downtown retailer. The Center for Applied Research
study also explained that when stores such as Wal-Mart
or Target propose building in small communities, the
initial reaction of local authorities is positive,
citing an increased tax base and more options for the
community. However, over the years, the result is often
a lower tax base as the smaller businesses close.
Proponents welcome the convenience, the lower prices,
free parking, and hours of operation (some are open 24
hours, seven days a week). Opponents say that some of
the disadvantages include: Poor customer service,
cluttered, unorganized stores which make it difficult
to find items, traffic congestion, sprawl, and less
competitive salaries and benefits as compared to their
smaller counterparts.
Minnesota Feels the ‘big box’ Pinch
Wal-Mart, Home Depot and Rainbow (grocery store),
have significantly impacted the regional and local
economies in several Minnesota communities. According
to Reginald Edwards, Executive Director of the Region
9 Development Commission in Mankato, Minnesota, an
EDA-funded district, the presence of the ‘big boxes’
have had detrimental impacts on the local drug, hardware
and grocery stores. “The ‘big box’ stores add value
to regions, but at the expense of local stores that
lose their customer base,” said Edwards.
The local stores in Minnesota are having difficulty
competing in pricing and product availability.
In addition, malls and ‘big boxes’ now co-exist in
regional hubs which pull customers from the smaller
communities. “Not only do they make regular trips to
these cluster areas, but commuters from small communities
patronize them on their way home from work,” added Edwards.
While the smaller businesses are struggling, Edwards
explained that some are surviving by finding niche markets
such as organic wild meat, or cultural specific foods;
they offer specials; many go the extra mile to offer good
customer service; and others have been able to maintain
their customer base through their involvement in community
activities like city parades, festivals or charity events.
“Big boxes bring some variety of products, competitive
pricing, and serve as a magnet for other economic
development,” said Edwards. “However, the cost is the
decline of small town grocery stores, hardware and drug
stores. Ultimately the decline in quality of life in
small communities,” he added.
Surviving the Supercenters
The ‘big box’ stores are dominating the smaller businesses
in rural communities, but industry experts believe it is
still possible to survive. Above all, according to the
National Grocers Association (NGA) President and CEO
Thomas K. Zaucha, in order for smaller businesses to
compete, they must focus on customer loyalty. “You must
be absolutely committed and obsessed with gaining customer
loyalty because a loyal customer feels compelled to drive
past a competitor’s store to shop at his favorite store,
whereas a satisfied customer is willing to shop anywhere.”
He added, “Customers agree supercenters have competitive
prices, friendly employees and good store conditions, but
they tell us price is not more important than quality and
freshness; that there aren’t always enough employees [at
supercenters] to serve customers; managers aren’t always
available to solve problems; and products they want are
not always in stock – all of which provide opportunities
for traditional supermarket operators to make hay in an
effort to gain customer loyalty.”
Zaucha commented that manufacturers could be valuable
partners in the independent’s survival. “Manufacturers
recognize the need for diversity in the marketplace, and
independent operators represent the keystone to that
diversity.” He added, “Manufacturers are beginning to
ask themselves whether they’re putting too many eggs in
one basket. While no one is questioning their commitment
to Wal-Mart, they are beginning to understand how
important a diversified market is.”
The NGA offers these tips to small retailers who attempt
to compete with the ‘big box” giants:
Work with wholesalers and direct-store-delivery companies
to develop marketing strategies.
Identify their own strengths and the supercenters
weaknesses and capitalize on those.
Promote aggressively rather than being buying-driven.
Operate clean, modern, friendly stores that let
customers know they have the best shopping
environment available.
Empower employees by treating them fairly,
encouraging and rewarding good performance,
and involving them in decision-making.
February 2003 Index |
Next Page |
Previous Page
NADO.org
What's New | EDFS | Job Ops | Legislative Affairs | Meetings | Membership | NADO Research Foundation | Officers and Staff | Policies and Priorities | Publications | Links | Site Map
National Association of Development Organizations
and the NADO Research Foundation
400 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 390
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 624-7806 . Fax (202) 624-8813 . info@nado.org
|