Making movies is big business in the United States, and as the film
industry continues to become more location-oriented, many rural communities
are benefiting. While the film industry can boost local economies, there is
growing concern over the increasing number of US film studios choosing to
make their movies offshore because of the incentives that other countries
offer.
The Department of Commerce Migration of US Film and Television
Production report released in 2001, estimates that film production
and distribution generate more than $20 billion in economic activity
in the United States per year. Data from the 1997 Economic Census
also indicates that the motion picture production industry employs
more than 270,000 workers in the United States, with an annual payroll
of $10.4 billion – more than the numbers of workers directly employed
in the steel industry.
Laurie Holden, (l) and Jim Carrey
starred in the 2001 movie,
The
Majestic, filmed in Humboldt
County, California
|
These numbers are substantial, but the Daily Variety, recently
reported that feature films shot in Canada have cost the
United States economy $1.8 billion and 22,400 jobs over
the past three years, (Feb. 5, 2002). Stephen Katz,
Co-Founder of the Center for Entertainment Industry
added that many film studios prepare their film budgets
assuming the movies will be made in Canada. Some industry
experts have cited the US dollar’s purchasing power abroad
as the primary reason for the exodus, but according to the
Variety article, others have blamed the unwillingness of US
unions to make concessions for specific work tasks that
foreign workers are willing to do.
The Department of Commerce report also indicates that California,
New York, Texas, Florida, Illinois and North Carolina account for
about 88 percent of national revenues generated directly by the
motion picture
“The playing field has changed.
One of the growing obstacles
for many film commissions
is being able to compete
for these projects.”
- Mary Nell Webb, Director,
Western North Carolina Regional
Film Commission
|
industry. But as a result of the increase in runaway productions,
the Midwest Office of the Directors Guild of America, which monitors
production activity in both the Midwest and the Southeast, reported
a 15 to 20 percent drop in feature film and television production
in these regions in 1998 and 1999 compared to 1996 and 1997.
Movie Industry a
Rainmaker
for Washington
Despite the number of US films produced overseas, many states are
still thriving and taking steps to keep movies on US soil,
especially in rural areas. For example, in l997, $11 million
was spent in rural Washington by films, television and commercials.
As a result, the Washington State Film Office initiated a Rural Economic
Development Program that is the Film Office’s priority outreach program
to rural communities around the state. It is designed to educate their
statewide partners about the film industry and to educate their community
about the economic benefits of production; the marketing value and job
creation opportunities for Washington residents. The program’s present
focus is to train statewide liaisons in community readiness, and to create
a resource network of location information and photos. They also offer
various hotel and tax incentives to film companies.
Hollywood Goes North
The Humboldt Film Commission, located in Northern California, promotes
the region as a cost effective and location-rich area for filming and
acts as a liaison between filmmakers and the communities. Barbara Bryant,
Humboldt County Film Commissioner said, “We attend film making trade shows
and respond to statewide film commission location opportunities. We also
hold local workshops for individuals and businesses that want to learn
about negotiating with filmmakers interested in using their property
for filming. We also assist the filmmakers in obtaining the proper
filming permits from county, city and state entities.”
“
“Our role, as indirect as it may be,
provides a good link in the network
between the Western North Carolina
Film Commission, film companies and
local governments. We know our
counties well, and if the
filmmakers are looking for a
specific attribute or setting
for their movie, we have people
who can provide assistance in
helping the film commission locate
what they are looking for.”
- Richard Fender, Executive Director,
Region D Council of Governments
|
Last year’s feature film The Majestic was shot in Humboldt County,
generating local revenues between $5 and $7 million. However,
Bryant added that they also attract a great deal of commercials
that generate an average of $1 million in revenue.
Bryant noted that The Majestic allowed local filmmakers
to build their resumes and gain national recognition while
spurring local film industry growth. A local casting director,
numerous acting extras and an upgrade to one community’s street
light fixtures, at no cost to the community, were also results
of the movie.
Bryant remarked that being a rural location has its selling points,
such as plenty of scenic, unpopulated spots for shooting film and
generally a lower labor cost. Being rural sometimes complicates
matters. The geographic area is larger and requires more time to
show prospective filmmakers the possible filming sites. Bryant said,
“Knowing the local community and its leaders is vital to making
things happen.”
Cameras Roll On
in North Carolina
According to the North Carolina Film Commission in Raleigh, the film
industry contributed more than $250 million to the state’s economy in
2000 and over $6 billion since 1980. It hosted 81 major productions,
up from 65 in 1999, including 56 television episodes, 19 feature films
and six made-for-television movies. The industry has produced over 600
movies and television shows, and has created more than 79,000 local
jobs since 1980.
Local hotels, restaurants, furniture outlets, grocery stores, construction
companies, auto rental agencies, caterers, lumber companies and office
supply stores have also benefited. “Seventy-five out of the 100 counties
have had movies and/or portions of movies filmed there,” said Randy
Schumacher, Marketing Specialist for the North Carolina Film Commission.
Schumacher added that filmmaking has resulted in long-term benefits,
including blending into the state’s tourism industry. Although The
Last of the Mohicans, filmed in Asheville, and in surrounding communities,
including Chimney Rock Park and the Biltmore Estate, was released more than
10 years ago, the community is still feeling the effects. “People want to
see where the movie was filmed. We have even had requests from couples
wanting to get married on the stone bridge, [a scene in the movie],”
Schumacher said. There is also no infrastructure development necessary
when filmmakers come to town. “They come in, set up, clean up and leave,”
but they leave a very positive impact on our economy and our image,”
he noted.
Knowing the local community
and its leaders is vital
to making
things happen.
|
Even though the film industry has contributed substantially
to North Carolina’s economy, and has established the state as
number three behind California and New York for hosting movie
and TV productions, Shumacher said that in some instances
residents have voiced concern over how their communities would be
portrayed in a movie. Residents have also questioned how filming
would disrupt traffic and the flow of the town.
The weekly drama Dawson’s Creek is filmed in Wilmington, a city that
has experienced substantial economic benefits including increased tourism,
temporary jobs for local residents, and a positive image of the city.
Johnny Griffin, Director of the Wilmington Regional Film Commission, Inc.,
explained that his organization relies on many of the area’s rural
communities when looking for prime filming locations. “There is also
the economic benefit for some of the more depressed areas who are
looking for some infusion of cash,” Griffin said.
Griffin noted that movie making is not geared toward long-term job
creation for rural communities. Most film crews come with a skilled,
trained workforce because they are only in town for a short period,
and there is no time to train local people for the technical jobs.
However, there is an opportunity in other areas. “There are instances
where they may need to have a casting call for 2000 extras in a movie
that pays $100 per day. This is a chance for a retired person or a
young student who is out of school for the summer,” Griffin said.
“That is money that is infused in the community that wasn’t there before.”
Mary Nell Webb, Director, of the Western North Carolina Regional
Film Commission, in Fletcher, explained that the film commission
landscape is drastically shifting throughout the United States.
“The playing field has changed. One of the growing obstacles for
many film commissions is being able to compete for these projects,”
she said. “Oftentimes, we can’t compete with the millions of dollars
of incentives that countries like Canada, and others worldwide can offer.”
Richard Fender, Executive Director of the Region D Council of Governments,
an EDA funded district in Boone, North Carolina, explained that his
organization is involved in a network that helps the Western Regional
Film Commission attract movies to the area. The economic development
impact has been very positive. Fender commented, “We want to be in a
position to attract the film industry to our area.” He added,
“Our role, as indirect as it may be, provides a good link in the
network between the Western North Carolina Film Commission, film
companies and local governments. We know our counties well, and if
the filmmakers are looking for a specific attribute or setting for
their movie, we have people who can provide assistance in helping the
film commission locate what they are looking for.”
Webb added, “It is a gamble in trying to recruit these film companies
to come to our small towns,” she said. “But we’ve also been very lucky
with the type of professionals who come into town to work. It has also
brought a great deal of free publicity which is always positive for the
small arena in which we operate.”
For More Information Contact:
February 2002 Index |
Next Page
NADO.org
What's New | EDFS | Job Ops | Legislative Affairs | Meetings | Membership | NADO Research Foundation | Officers and Staff | Policies and Priorities | Publications | Links | Site Map
National Association of Development Organizations
and the NADO Research Foundation
400 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 390
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 624-7806 . Fax (202) 624-8813 . info@nado.org
|