Wireless
Wireless cable, or multipoint multichannel distribution system (MMDS), is another option for delivering data via point-to-multipoint microwave radio signals. Local Multipoint Distribution System (LMDS) is another fixed wireless technology capable of providing broadband service. It offers higher data rates but shorter range (no more than three or four miles) than MMDS. Another option is satellite service, which is particularly promising for remote rural areas. Satellite systems are already in use and promise to offer broadband services regardless of location or geography.
Options for Rural Regions
For rural regions to effectively participate in the telecommunications “revolution,” there are four possible options:
- A Rural Area Network, in which government, educational institutions, businesses and residents aggregate demand and use one access point. This solution allows a community to overcome the lack of demand inherent in smaller populations and population densities. By pooling users, a community can create more leverage, share costs and aggregate demand. This allows a single point of connection, connecting multiple users to a network and then connecting the network to a public network via a service provider. The result is that residents can get advanced telecommunications they might not have if they had not banded together.
- “Interconnection” or “piggybacking,” eliminates the need to build duplicate infrastructure in rural areas. This option requires only that a rural community pay the cost of extending the connection to the network. The only drawback to this option is that owners of an urban network (telephone companies) have little or no incentive to allow this, since it means that rural telephone companies can compete with them for business and profits and may take away some of their capacity.
- Wireless telecommunications holds some promise for remote rural areas, due to the prohibitive costs of setting up wireline technologies. Wireless technologies include microwave and radio, and can eliminate the need to stretch miles of wire and cable. Experts say this will become the dominant technology for most remote and low-density telephone cooperatives. The limit to this option is that wireless is confined to voice, fax and low-speed data transmission. It is also expensive, requiring towers and satellites.
- The final option is working with alternative providers. Large telephone companies are unlikely to provide rural areas with the needed services, because they have no incentive. Smaller telephone companies, electric utilities, cable television companies and municipalities themselves are often in the best position to ensure their communities get what they need.