By Laurie Thompson, Director of Programs, NADO Research Foundation
and Melissa Levy, Contributing Writer
In early June 2002, Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman
declared 32 counties in Nebraska agricultural disasters.
Because of high winds, frost, hail, drought and
unseasonably cold spring temperatures over the past year,
farmers in these counties are eligible for emergency
loans. State officials have expressed concern that this
drought may be as severe as the drought of 2000, which
had a $1.1 billion negative impact on the state’s
economy.
In June 2002, Indiana Governor George Ryan announced that
his request to add five counties to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency’s (FEMA) list of counties eligible for
disaster assistance was approved. Storms, tornadoes and
floods that began in mid-April caused 38 of the state’s
counties to be eligible for assistance.
The common denominator in these situations was the
weather. Weather can wreak havoc on the lives of
individuals, and can also drastically affect the nation’s
economy. The National Farmers Union reported that drought,
floods and other natural disasters devastated 1,500
counties in 2001. In that same year, $1.5 billion was
paid in claims to flood victims, with more than $1
billion for over 30,000 claims related to Tropical Storm
Allison alone.
The economic impacts of weather are often far-reaching
and long lasting. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) reports that 10 percent of
industries that contribute to the nation’s Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) are “weather and climate sensitive,”
including outdoor sports and recreation, construction,
energy distribution and agriculture. The percentage
nearly triples when industries that are indirectly
affected by climate and weather are considered. NOAA
estimates that almost 25 percent of the GDP totaling
$2.7 trillion, is impacted by weather and climate.
Existing Federal and State Initiatives
Three western state governors, Jane Dee Hull of Arizona,
Gary Johnson of New Mexico and Judy Martz of Montana,
wrote in the May 28, 2002 National Drought Monitor that
“40 percent of the mainland United States is in a
‘moderate’ or worse drought. Portions of 25 states
(13 in the West and 12 in the East) are in a ‘severe’
to ‘extreme’ drought. And parts of Arizona, Colorado,
Montana, New Mexico and Utah are now in an ‘exceptional’
drought, which is as bad as it gets.” On average, about
18 percent of the country experiences drought conditions.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has been
instrumental in working with communities to help their
citizens after natural disaster strikes. In addition,
the Economic Development Administration’s (EDA) Economic
Adjustment Program has helped businesses get back on
their feet after natural disasters. In September 2001,
US Commerce Secretary Don Evans announced a $1.855
million EDA grant to the city of Granite Falls, Minnesota
to help the community recover from the economic impact of
a July 2000 tornado and resulting plant closures. “The
tornado and plant closures have had a devastating impact
on the local economy. The project will help the
community diversify its economy, attract public
investment, and create new jobs for local citizens,”
said Evans.
While systems are in place at the national level,
solutions to weather-related difficulties are not as
well-organized for local communities. Despite the Farm
Bureau’s availability to deal with weather-related
agricultural losses in rural areas, they are predominantly
aimed at animals and crops. (The Farm Bureau, the
nation’s leading general farm organization, is an
affiliate of the American Farm Bureau Federation.)
Yet, rural economies are far more than agriculture.
In addition, most weather-related assistance is provided
in order to save lives, not money or economies. In terms
of mitigating damage and loss, the programs are there,
whether they are administered by FEMA or EDA or other
non-profit or private organizations.
According to Jim Giraytys, Certified Consulting
Meteorologist, “The issues of weather impact on local
economies have not yet been systemically addressed in a
way that local communities can cope or plan. In fact,
some of the most serious problems are drought and heat.”
He explained that despite the high level of technology
that exists, there is no organized way for rural
communities to deal with most weather impacts. “It is
also a matter of (1) believing that one can and must do
some strategic planning for natural disasters and (2)
education,” explained Giraytys.
Mitigation Planning a Challenge
John Galusha, Regional Planner at the Southern Colorado
Economic Development District (SCEDD), an EDA funded
district, explained what has happened in southeastern
Colorado as a result of the current drought, “The
economic effects of the drought have rippled throughout
the state, including a drop in tourism of at least 10
percent and a “hard hit” to the agricultural industry.
Even if the physical effects of this drought are limited
to 2002, the impacts will be felt for at least two more
years.” Galusha added that they are asking the state
legislature to deal with loss prevention for the tourism
industry; the agricultural industry is eligible for
weather-related assistance but the tourism industry is
ineligible.
Tourism operators are suffering heavy losses, according
to Galusha, because there is no concerted effort to
organize as a network with other tourism-related
industries. Galusha commented, “What encompasses the
tourism industry? There is no defined line. We know the
need is there, but we do not know who to help or how.”
Meanwhile, SCEDD, in concert with Action 22 -- an
organization of the 22 counties in southeastern Colorado
to promote tourism and coordinate lobbying efforts at the
state level -- received a grant from the state office of
economic development to host the Familiarization Tour,
in an effort to bring travel writers to Colorado to
“write articles so that we can look good in somebody’s
eyes,” said Galusha.
Hurricanes Hinder Local Economies
In southern Florida, hurricanes impact not only the
communities, but also the local economies. According to
John Hulsey, Senior Planner at the South Florida Regional
Planning Council (RPC), an EDA designated economic
development district, the economic impacts of 1992’s
Hurricane Andrew were tremendous. The total property
damages were $22.6 billion and insured property damages
were $15.4 billion. The hurricane also impacted more
than 40,000 jobs, due to recovery/reconstruction jobs
offsetting failed/relocated businesses. Almost 235,000
single-family homes, 173,000 multi-family homes, 20,000
mobile homes, 146,000 automobiles, and 60,000 boats were
damaged. More than 20,000 nonfarm businesses suffered
damage, and the costs to governments soared. Costs to
the state of Florida totaled $960 million. This included
$1.5 billion to local governments and $2.4 billion to
Homestead Air Force Base. Other costs to the federal
government were $144 million, farm losses were $455
million, and federal government recovery costs were
$5.7 billion.
The South Florida RPC continues to concentrate on hazard
mitigation as a strategy to enhance and protect the
regional economy prior to disasters. In December 2000,
the council distributed more than 2,500 copies of its
recently published Hurricane Survival Guide for Small
Businesses. Published in English, Spanish and Haitian
Creole, the guide is an instruction booklet for small
business owners and managers to use for developing their
own emergency plans and preparations. Prior to hurricane
season in 2001, the council distributed another 1,500
copies to business owners attending the South Florida
Regional Hurricane Conference in Fort Lauderdale. The
guide is also available in all three languages on the
council’s website, www.sfrpc.com.
In FY 2000-2001, South Florida RPC staff prepared a model
Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan for communities in South
Florida. The plan offers alternative strategies to local
governments to improve the odds of economic and
psychological recovery from disasters and will help to
retain jobs that are often lost as a result of disasters.
The model plan was completed in Fall of 2001 and
distributed to the 70 local governments in the South
Florida region, as well as the ten other regions in
Florida.
For More Information, Contact: Jim Giraytys at
540/722-4633; John Galusha of SCEDD at 719/545-8680;
and John Hulsey of South Florida RPC at 800/985-4416.
August 2002 Index |
Next Page |
Previous Page
NADO.org
What's New | EDFS | Job Ops | Legislative Affairs | Meetings | Membership | NADO Research Foundation | Officers and Staff | Policies and Priorities | Publications | Links | Site Map
National Association of Development Organizations
and the NADO Research Foundation
400 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 390
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 624-7806 . Fax (202) 624-8813 . info@nado.org
|