National Association of Development Organizations
[Webinar]: Why Clusters Matter: Industry-focused Strategies for Regional Economic Competitiveness
This webinar showed how cluster strategies align business, workforce, and public investment, shared real examples from Economic Development District staff using cluster analysis, and outlined practical steps for regions to launch or strengthen their own cluster initiatives. The post [Webinar]: Why Clusters Matter: Industry-focused Strategies for Regional Economic Competitiveness appeared first on NADO.
Click here to access the presentation slides (PDF) Across the country, Economic Development Districts (EDDs) are turning to cluster identification and development to strengthen their regional economies. Recent analysis of Comprehensive Economic Development Strategies (CEDS) shows that more than six in seven EDDs are pursuing at least one industry cluster goal, a clear signal that the practice has become a mainstream expectation in regional development. During this webinar, panelists contrasted cluster‑based strategies with traditional economic development approaches, showed how cluster work strengthens alignment across business, workforce, and public investment, highlighted real examples from staff at Economic Development Districts who are using cluster analysis, and outlined practical steps regions can take to launch or advance their own cluster initiatives. Panelists: • Jason Rittenberg, Principal, Excel Regional Solutions LLC (OH) • Kirsten Montgomery, Research and Insights Manager, Greater Peoria EDC (IL) • Brian White, Regional Project Manager, Land of Sky Regional Council (NC) • Moderator: Brett Schwartz, Associate Director, NADO Research Foundation (CA) Additional resources: Cluster Identification Self-Guided Course (from the Center for Cluster Development) Regional Clusters Dashboards (from the Purdue Center for Regional Development) East Central Florida Regional Innovations Clusters Dashboard (from the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council) This webinar was offered through the NADO Research Foundation’s Economic Development District Community of Practice (EDD CoP). The EDD CoP is made possible through an award from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (ED22HDQ3070106). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the presenters and participants and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Economic Development Administration or the U.S. Department of Commerce. The post [Webinar]: Why Clusters Matter: Industry-focused Strategies for Regional Economic Competitiveness appeared first on NADO.
This resource page includes a variety of information on Opportunity Zones, including background information, updates on the designation process, mapping and data tools to support informed planning and decision making, and materials about local planning and implementation considerations. The post Opportunity Zones 2.0 Resource Guide appeared first on NADO.
<img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="1024" height="217" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/OZ7-1024x217.png" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-32407" alt="" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/OZ7-1024x217.png 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/OZ7-300x64.png 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/OZ7-768x163.png 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/OZ7.png 1080w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) signed into law on July 4, 2025 made Opportunity Zones (OZs) a permanent feature of the tax code. First introduced in 2017, OZs are federally designated, economically distressed census tracts where investors can receive special tax incentives for putting capital into local development projects. The next round of zone designations kicks off July 1, 2026, when state governors begin a 90-day nomination window. New zones will subsequently take effect January 1, 2027 and last through December 31, 2036. There are some key changes from OZ 1.0 to OZ 2.0 that EDDs should understand. The biggest are that the program is now permanent, with zones redesignated every ten years, and eligibility has been tightened. The income threshold for qualifying tracts have been lowered from 80% to 70% of area median family income, the contiguous tract provision is eliminated, and the number of eligible tracts nationwide shrinks by about a quarter. The most significant new feature for rural regions is the Qualified Rural Opportunity Fund (QROF), which offers investors a 30% basis step-up (compared to 10% for standard funds) and lowers the substantial improvement threshold for rehab projects from 100% to 50%. Rural areas are defined as locations outside cities and towns with populations over 50,000. This resource page includes a variety of information on Opportunity Zones, including background information, updates on the designation process, mapping and data tools to support informed planning and decision making, and materials about local planning and implementation considerations. It also includes notes on how EDD and RDO staff can best use these resources to support their work. Contact NADO Program Manager Dion Thompson-Davoli at dthompson-davoli@nado.org with any questions or to suggest additional resources to include on this page. Last updated April 8, 2026 Understanding the OZ Program Economic Innovation Group: Opportunity Zones 2.0 — Where Things Stand After the One Big Beautiful Bill Act https://eig.org/opportunity-zones-2-0-where-things-stand/ This overview from EIG, the organization that originally conceived the OZ policy, covers the new eligibility criteria, redesignation process, incentive structure changes, enhanced rural investment provisions, and other issues. EDDs looking for a single authoritative summary of what has changed should start here. Economic Innovation Group: OZs 2.0 Resources Hub https://eig.org/ozs-resources/ This centralized resource page brings together EIG’s updated eligibility map, policy analyses, webinar recordings for state and local policymakers, and guidance documents. It includes an interactive eligibility map showing which census tracts meet OZ 2.0 qualifying criteria nationwide based on the latest ACS data. EDDs can use this to access the most current OZ 2.0 information and tools. HUD: Opportunity Zones Portal https://opportunityzones.hud.gov/ HUD’s main OZ portal, updated for OZ 2.0, includes interactive maps of current 1.0 designations, rural area census tracts, information for investors and communities, and links to federal resources. The site also links to the HUD Exchange resources page which catalogs how various HUD programs (CDBG, HOME, Choice Neighborhoods, RAD) can be layered with OZ investments. IRS: Opportunity Zones https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/businesses/opportunity-zones The IRS’s official OZ page covering eligibility requirements, filing information for Qualified Opportunity Funds, and links to regulations and guidance. EDDs can direct staff, communities, and potential investors here for information on the tax mechanics of the program. Tax Policy Center (Brookings/Urban): What Are Opportunity Zones and How Do They Work? https://taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/what-are-opportunity-zones-and-how-do-they-work This resource works as a politically neutral explainer covering how the OZ program works, its structure, investment patterns, and early evidence on outcomes from the first round. It notes that just 1% of zones received 42% of investment and that 78% of investments went to just 5% of zones, which may be useful context for EDDs thinking about how to position their communities for the next round. Congressional Research Service: Tax Incentives for Opportunity Zones https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45152 CRS’s nonpartisan overview of the OZ program including the tax mechanics, evidence on investment patterns from the first round, the potential for “stacking” OZ incentives with other federal tools like New Market Tax Credits, and policy considerations. EDDs may want to consult this document when considering how federal economic development incentive programs may overlap in their regions. The Designation Process and Zone Selection Economic Innovation Group: Opportunity Zones 2.0 — A Guide for Governors and Mayors https://eig.org/ozs-guidance/ This report walks through the national designation process and timeline, provides a framework for selecting zones strategically, and offers eight principles for a robust state selection process. It emphasizes that governors should engage regional stakeholders early and that states should use nominations to reward places that reduce barriers to investment. EDDs can use this to understand the process their governors will follow and to position their regions and localities for strong nominations. [Webinar] Urban Institute: Selecting the Next Round of Opportunity Zones — New Evidence and Field Reflections https://www.urban.org/events/selecting-next-round-opportunity-zones-new-evidence-and-field-reflections This webinar reviews evidence on OZ investment trends from OZ 1.0 and field experience with the goal of informing how states should decide which places to nominate. It features researchers from Urban Institute, Brookings, and practitioners from organizations like Accelerator for America and National Equity Fund. Speakers also discuss how city and county officials and other local stakeholders can help states make strong nominations. EDDs can use this to understand what made certain zones successful and what factors to emphasize when advocating for nominations in their regions. Urban Institute: Data to Inform 2026 Opportunity Zone Selections https://datacatalog.urban.org/dataset/data-inform-2026-opportunity-zone-selections The Urban Institute’s national data tool models OZ investment potential and classifies census tracts into three categories: “Less likely to attract OZ investment,” “More likely to attract OZ investment, with larger impact,” and “Likely to attract capital even without OZs.” While not dispositive, it reflects Urban’s experience working with stakeholders on OZs and its data analysis expertise. EDDs can download this data to identify “Goldilocks” tracts in their regions, places with genuine need and realistic investment potential. Frost Brown Todd: Strategic Selection of Opportunity Zones 2.0 — A Governor’s Guide to Best Practices https://fbtgibbons.com/strategic-selection-of-opportunity-zones-2-0-a-governors-guide-to-best-practices/ This guide offers a practical framework for the 2026 OZ redesignation, covering recommended income thresholds for tract selection, rural-urban split strategies by state type, the role of transportation access in rural designations, and how to balance investor interest against community need. It also reviews first-round performance data, including which zones attracted investment and why many did not. EDDs can use this to understand the criteria governors are likely to apply and to strengthen nomination cases for their regions. [Webinar] Economic Innovation Group: OZs 2.0: What State and Local Leaders Need to Know https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZE5Rv3eSdE This recorded webinar from EIG provides state and local policymakers with practical guidance on the OZ program under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In particular, it addresses how states and localities can align designations with long-term community priorities and position themselves to attract private capital. EDDs can use this to help think through how their OZ strategy mirrors that of their existing community plans, including the CEDS. Housing Policy Lab: Opportunity Zones Resources https://www.localhousingsolutions.org/housing-policy-library/opportunity-zones/ This brief focuses on how the OZ program intersects with housing. It synthesizes research on where OZ 1.0 housing investment went, finding that capital concentrated in urban tracts with strong existing markets rather than the most distressed areas. It also includes practical examples of how cities used OZ incentives to support affordable housing. EDDs working on housing as part of their regional strategies may find the research summary and city-level examples useful for thinking about how to pair OZ designations with existing housing and land use tools. Partners for Rural Transformation, Housing Assistance Council, and HOPE Policy Institute: Activating Rural Investments in the Next Round of Opportunity Zones https://ruralhome.org/activating-rural-investments-in-the-next-round-of-opportunity-zones/ This brief offers recommendations for how states can ensure their OZ 2.0 designations reach rural communities, particularly areas of persistent poverty. It argues that the statute’s broad definition of “rural” is insufficient on its own and recommends that states layer additional criteria including persistent poverty status and alignment with existing state investments in broadband, housing, and economic development. It also covers stakeholder engagement, technical assistance for rural project sponsors, and includes OZ 1.0 rural case studies in affordable housing, senior care, historic revitalization, and broadband. It is particularly relevant for EDDs looking to advocate for rural tract nominations in their states or help communities prepare for OZ investment. Mapping and Data Tools Novogradac: Opportunity Zones 2.0 Mapping Tool https://www.novoco.com/resource-centers/opportunity-zones-resource-center/novogradac-opportunity-zones-20-mapping-tool Novogradac’s free interactive mapping tool shows which census tracts are likely eligible or ineligible for OZ designation in the 2026 round. It categorizes tracts as “Likely Eligible, Likely Rural,” “Likely Eligible, Likely Not Rural,” “Likely Eligible, Potentially Rural,” and “Likely Not Eligible.” EDDs can use this to identify which tracts in their regions are likely to qualify under the tighter 2.0 criteria and to begin conversations with local governments. Economic Innovation Group: OZ 2.0 Interactive Eligibility Map https://www.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/c473c71f0704408f934fbdc342caf1f1 EIG’s eligibility map gives its interpretation of which census tracts meet OZ 2.0 qualifying criteria nationwide based on the latest ACS data. EDDs should check both tools and compare results for their regions. HUD: Opportunity Zones Map (1.0 and Rural Area Census Tracts) https://opportunityzones.hud.gov/ HUD’s mapping tool shows current OZ 1.0 designations alongside rural area boundaries as defined by the OBBBA. It may be useful for EDDs comparing the current OZ map to the likely 2.0 eligibility landscape. Considerations for Community Planning and Local Implementation Treasury Department Guidance to States: Nominating Eligible Tracts https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/treasury-irs-provide-guidance-to-states-for-nominating-census-tracts-as-qualified-opportunity-zones-under-the-one-big-beautiful-bill This Treasury Department guidance, directed to gubernatorial offices, describes in detail the Opportunity Zones designation process. It also includes an official list of eligible Census Tracts for designation. There are 25,332 eligible Tracts, of which 8,334 are comprised entirely of rural areas. It is expected that this page will be updated with interactive tools to view the eligible tracts in the coming weeks. EDDs may find this useful for understanding specifically how governors will nominate tracts for designation. EPA: Leveraging Opportunity Zones for Community Revitalization https://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/leveraging-opportunity-zones-community-revitalization These reports, developed to help communities leverage their OZ 1.0 designations, describe how help communities can advance their plans and visions for redevelopment and revitalization, prioritize specific needs, preserve community character, and overcome project financing barriers to attract private capital: Leveraging Development Finance Tools to Attract Opportunity Zone Investment (PDF): Provides an overview of various development finance tools and how communities can use those tools to finance projects. Assembled together, these tools can help form a project’s capital stack. Building A Community Prospectus: A Framework for Attracting Sustainable and Equitable Opportunity Zone Investment (PDF): Outlines a 7-step process for developing a community prospectus with strategies and case study examples that promote sustainability and thriving communities. It is designed to help communities articulate their vision, priorities, and assets and develop incentives and guardrails for attracting investment. Five Strategies for Engaging Opportunity Zone Investors (PDF): Includes key things to know about OZ investors and ideas for engaging them. It also aims to help communities get started in demonstrating readiness for investment. Urban Institute: Opportunity Zone Community Impact Assessment Tool https://www.urban.org/projects/capital-communities-scorecard-digital-user-guide A tool for assessing the potential social impact of proposed OZ investments across six dimensions: jobs, community wealth building, housing, environment, health/services, and transportation. This may be useful for EDDs and local governments that want to evaluate whether proposed projects align with community priorities before lending support. Local Infrastructure Hub/Results for America: Guide to the New Opportunity Zones — A Primer for Cities https://localinfrastructure.org/resources/guide-to-the-new-opportunity-zones-a-primer-for-cities/ This series of case studies reviews cities that took active approaches to OZ implementation in the first round and makes recommendations for them this time around. It also includes a webinar recording. EDDs can share this with local governments as a resource specifically targeted for their needs. TIP Strategies: Laying the Groundwork for Opportunity Zones 2.0 https://tipstrategies.com/insights/2025/12/groundwork-for-opportunity-zones/ This practitioner-focused guide lays out an approach to analyzing eligible tracts, overlaying community priorities, preparing investment prospectuses, building “stacks” with complementary tools (TIF, public-private partnerships, local grants), and understanding new compliance requirements. It can be used by EDDs as they look at making potential tract recommendations or shared with local and state partners. EDA Presentation to Southwest Region Economic Development Association (SWREDA) on Opportunity Zones and CEDS Development, 2019 https://swreda.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ivesoz-191213215840.pdf This conference session presentation from the first round of Opportunity Zones includes advice aimed squarely at EDDs for integrating OZs into economic development planning, including through the CEDS. The presentation highlights key considerations for measuring and reporting OZ performance and ideas for leveraging CEDS planning to create durable coalitions that can spur investment in designated zones. Its recommendations may be relevant to EDDs and other economic development organizations as they begin to create plans to leverage new OZ designations in their communities. This resource is offered through the Economic Development District Community of Practice (EDD CoP), managed by the NADO Research Foundation to build the capacity of the national network of EDDs. To learn more, visit: www.nado.org/EDDCoP. The EDD CoP is made possible through an award from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (ED22HDQ3070106). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this resource are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Economic Development Administration or the U.S. Department of Commerce. The views and opinions expressed by other organizations or outside publications referenced in this resource guide do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of the National Association of Development Organizations or its members. The post Opportunity Zones 2.0 Resource Guide appeared first on NADO.
Telling Our Stories: Highlights from the 2026 Afternoon with the Districts
NADO’s Afternoon with the Districts event offered an opportunity for EDD leaders to step back, reflect, and strengthen their storytelling techniques and approaches. Nearly 50 participants gathered to explore new ways to communicate impact, share successes, and elevate the essential role EDDs play nationwide. The post Telling Our Stories: Highlights from the 2026 Afternoon with the Districts appeared first on NADO.
<img decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03374-1024x576.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-32384" style="width:736px;height:auto" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03374-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03374-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03374-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03374-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03374-2048x1152.jpg 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> In a rapidly changing economic landscape, Economic Development Districts (EDDs) and other Regional Development Organizations (RDOs) are being called on not just to deliver results, but to clearly demonstrate their value to the communities they serve. That’s why this year’s Afternoon with the Districts, held immediately following the 2026 NADO & DDAA Washington Conference as part of NADO’s Economic Development District Community of Practice (EDD CoP), offered an opportunity for EDD leaders to step back, reflect, and strengthen their storytelling techniques and approaches. Nearly 50 participants gathered to explore new ways to communicate impact, share successes, and elevate the essential role EDDs play nationwide. Strategic Storytelling for Influence and Engagement Following a “Rose-Bud-Thorn” networking exercise to get the crowd moving and updates from staff at the U.S. Economic Development Administration, Georgetown University professor John D. Trybus, Ph.D delivered the event keynote, entitled “Strategic Storytelling for Influence and Engagement.” Professor Trybus currently leads and manages Georgetown University’s Center for Social Impact Communication, but identifies as a “story-scientist” and previously gained recognition for serving as personal advisor to United Nations Messenger of Peace, Dr. Jane Goodall. Dr. Trybus shared that “stories are the currency of human life because they help us to create and share meaning together.” The importance of stories stems from the theory that humans are natural storytellers with people using them in approximately 65% of their interactions. He noted that we can engage with stories in different roles, including as storytellers, story-listeners, and story-conveners. Stories can be powerful because of their unique ability to describe a series of events while simultaneously conveying greater meaning, but only if we tell them the right way. Professor Trybus discussed how good stories are created and shared, breaking down different story types, like visionary stories, and offering a story framework that includes six essential building blocks. These include character, trajectory, authenticity, action-oriented emotions, a hook, and the storyteller themselves. <img decoding="async" width="1024" height="373" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/keynote-1024x373.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-32396" style="width:734px;height:auto" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/keynote-1024x373.jpg 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/keynote-300x109.jpg 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/keynote-768x280.jpg 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/keynote-1536x560.jpg 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/keynote-2048x746.jpg 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Finally, Dr. Trybus encouraged the group not only to practice good storytelling but also to become attentive story listeners. In a professional setting, this means showing genuine interest in the stories of a person or community to build connection and shared understanding. Listening should go beyond simply hearing what a person says. We should strive to be relational listeners who aim to understand the emotions and meaning behind a story or message. Economic development practitioners know the importance of community engagement and collaboration; that much isn’t new. Professor Trybus’ keynote added to the conversation by expanding a tool for collaborating with community members and sharing information. In the next session, attendees saw examples of storytelling from the field, hearing how different methods like in-person convenings, videos, and interactive web platforms can utilize the skills Dr. Trybus described. Peer Presentations: EDD Communication & Outreach Strategies Moderated by NADO Research and Writing Fellow London Weier, the panel featured Scott Warner, Executive Director of the Mid-Shore Regional Council (MSRC) in Easton, Maryland; Eric Wright, Director of Planning and Development at the East Alabama Regional Planning and Development Commission (EARPDC) in Anniston, Alabama; and a recorded presentation from Jen Gregory, Executive Director of the Southern Tier 8 Regional Board in Binghamton, New York. The session began with a video produced by NADO and the National Association of Regional Councils through the EDD CoP emphasizing MSRC’s work supporting economic growth across Maryland’s Eastern Shore. The video offered attendees an inside look at the district and the alliances that power its work. Following this, Warner delved into the success he has had with collaboration at MSRC by working closely with county governments, businesses, elected officials, minority representatives, and resource-based industries to bring hundreds of jobs and millions of dollars in investment to the region. Warner emphasized the role of data-driven storytelling, highlighting the Delmarva Index, a GIS tool developed with several regional partners that helps leaders visualize the broader impact of targeted investments and strengthens grant applications. He also discussed the Eastern Shore Entrepreneurship Center, a nonprofit initiative developed by the MSRC that provides entrepreneurs and small businesses with access to capital and technical support. Finally, Warner shared how MSRC communicates its Return on Investment and CEDS projects through a short 2-pager (examples here and here) that is shared with its board, elected officials, funders, and the public. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03787-1-1024x576.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-32387" style="width:723px;height:auto" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03787-1-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03787-1-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03787-1-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03787-1-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03787-1-2048x1152.jpg 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Wright’s presentation featured how his work at EARPDC has centered on relationship building with local leaders, particularly during a period of political transition across Alabama. A recent change in state law aligned most mayoral elections to November 2025, resulting in 25 newly elected mayors across EARPDC’s 10-county, 54-municipality region, many who were unfamiliar with the planning commission or the CEDS process. To maintain momentum on regional projects, Wright and his team launched a proactive outreach strategy, identifying incoming officials early and conducting one-on-one, in-person visits with newly elected mayors to better understand local priorities before connecting mayors with relevant EARPDC resources. These early meetings helped establish trust and made later requests easier. To further support engagement, the commission introduced more accessible communication tools, including an interactive CEDS dashboard and a digital Story Map version of its annual report. Wright also highlighted the Partners in Progress convenings, which connected new mayors with state and federal partners, funding opportunities, and peers at the start of their terms, reinforcing EARPDC’s role as a hub for regional collaboration. Early results were strong: 18 of the 25 new mayors participated, and eight grant funded projects entered the pipeline. Wright emphasized that anticipating leadership changes, building relationships early, and simplifying complex planning tools are key to sustaining momentum during times of change. Jen Gregory’s recorded presentation showcased SO-Tier.com, an interactive website developed by Southern Tier 8. The site, a 2025 NADO Impact Award recipient, uses GIS mapping and data visualization to highlight public investments, community assets, and business opportunities across the Southern Tier region of New York. Gregory illustrated how the platform brings together information on regional industries, workforce development, Opportunity Zones, and quality-of-life assets across eight counties and nearly 580,000 residents. By translating complex data into an engaging, easy to understand format, SO-Tier.com helps businesses and policymakers better understand the region’s economic potential. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03948-1-1024x576.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-32388" style="width:733px;height:auto" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03948-1-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03948-1-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03948-1-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03948-1-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/DSC03948-1-2048x1152.jpg 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> The day wrapped up with small group discussions that gave participants space to reflect on what they learned, ask questions, and identify concrete next steps they plan to bring back to their regions. These conversations underscored the value of shared learning and the collective commitment to elevating the work of EDDs nationwide. We’re excited to carry this momentum into next year, when we celebrate the 10th anniversary of Afternoon with the Districts. See you there! Thanks to NADO Fellows London Weier & Ethan Simon for their contributions to this event recap and Matthew Leder for the photographs. <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="336" height="299" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/EDD_CoP_logo_transparent.png" alt="" class="wp-image-29083" style="width:148px;height:auto" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/EDD_CoP_logo_transparent.png 336w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/EDD_CoP_logo_transparent-300x267.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 336px) 100vw, 336px" /> This event was offered through the Economic Development District Community of Practice (EDD CoP), made possible through an award from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (ED22HDQ3070106). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the participants and trainers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Economic Development Administration or the U.S. Department of Commerce. The post Telling Our Stories: Highlights from the 2026 Afternoon with the Districts appeared first on NADO.
President Trump Releases FY27 Budget Request
On April 3rd 2026, President Trump published his FY27 budget request for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2026. The post President Trump Releases FY27 Budget Request appeared first on NADO.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Untitled-design-4-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-32428" alt="" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Untitled-design-4-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Untitled-design-4-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Untitled-design-4-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Untitled-design-4-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Untitled-design-4.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> April 3, 2026 White House Releases FY27 Budget Request Overview On April 3rd 2026, the White House released the President’s FY 2027 (FY27) discretionary budget request to Congress, outlining the administration’s proposal for spending for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2026. The release of this budget officially kicks off the FY27 appropriations process. The President’s budget request is technically due to Congress by the first Monday in February. Although it sets priorities for the fiscal year starting October 1, the proposal is non-binding, acting only as a recommendation. Congress frequently ignores or significantly alters the request, with final spending decisions made through the appropriations process. See NADO’s blog on appropriations HERE. What’s in the President’s Budget Overall, the President’s Budget for FY27 proposes a 10-percent discretionary funding cut compared to FY26 for non-defense funding. For further details, see the Budget Appendix. Below is a list of proposed cuts and additions to relevant agencies and programs for Regional Development Organizations (RDOs): Department of Agriculture The Budget requests $20.8 billion in discretionary budget authority for USDA for FY2027, a $4.9 billion or 19-percent decrease from the FY2026 enacted level. Rural Business Service (RBS) (–$82 million). Eliminated Community Facilities Grant Earmarks (–$659 million) Eliminated Department of Commerce The Budget requests $9.2 billion in discretionary budget authority for the Department of Commerce for FY2027, a $1.3 billion or 12.2-percent decrease from the FY2026 enacted level. Economic Development Administration (EDA) (–$449 million) Eliminated This zeroes out EDA’s budget for FY27. However, in FY26, Congress opted to level fund EDA despite the White House zeroing it out in the President’s Budget. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (–$993 million) Reduced National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) (–$2.2 billion) Reduced Department of Homeland Security The Budget requests $63 billion in discretionary budget authority for DHS for FY2027, a $2.2 billion or 3.3-percent decrease from the FY2026 Continuing Resolution level. FEMA Non-Disaster Grant Programs (–$1.3 billion) Non-Disaster Eliminated Department of Housing and Urban Development The Budget requests $73.5 billion in discretionary budget authority for HUD for FY2027, a $10.7 billion or 13-percent decrease from the FY2026 enacted level. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (–$3.3 billion) Eliminated This is the sixth time that President Trump has attempted to end the CDBG program. Congress has ignored his request each time. HOME Investment Partnerships Program (–$1.3 billion) Eliminated Homeless Assistance Programs (–$393 million) Eliminated Department of Labor The Budget requests $9.9 billion in discretionary budget authority for the Department of Labor (DOL) for FY2027, a $3.5 billion or 25.9-percent decrease from the FY2026 enacted level. Job Corps (–$1.6 billion) Eliminated Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) (–$395 million) Eliminated Department of Transportation The Budget requests $26.6 billion in discretionary budget authority for the Department of Transportation for FY2027, a $1.6 billion or 6.2-percent increase from the FY2026 enacted level. Big, Beautiful Infrastructure (+$1.3 billion) Increased The Budget provides $770 million for the Nationally Significant Multimodal Freight & Highway Projects discretionary grants program to and an additional $714 million to repair or replace highway bridges in disrepair. Department of Treasury The Budget requests $11.5 billion in gross discretionary budget authority for Treasury’s domestic programs for FY2027, a $1.5 billion or 12-percent decrease from the FY2026 enacted level. Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund (–$204.5 million) Eliminated Environmental Protection Agency The Budget requests $4.2 billion in discretionary budget authority for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for FY2027, a $4.6 billion or 52-percent decrease from the FY2026 enacted level. State Revolving Funds (SRF) (– ~$2.5 billion) Nearly Eliminated Categorical Grants (– ~$1 billion) Reduced Small Business Administration The Budget requests $329 million in discretionary budget authority for the Small Business Administration (SBA) for 2027, a $671 million or 67-percent decrease from the 2026 enacted level. Entrepreneurial Development Programs (–$309 million) Nearly Eliminated Salaries and Expenses (S&E) (–$170 million) Reduced Regional Commissions The Budget provides $120 million for the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC), a 40% reduction from FY 2026 funding. The Budget eliminates funding for all other Regional Commissions. Next Steps Within the six weeks following submission of the President’s Budget, the various congressional committees should ideally report their spending and revenue proposals to the House and Senate budget committees. After each budget committee compiles this information, Congress is supposed to pass a concurrent budget resolution. However, failure to pass a budget resolution has recently become more common. All 12 appropriations bills need to be passed by September 30. However, Congress oftentimes passes a short-term Continuing Resolution to fund the government while appropriators continue their work to draft and pass funding bills. NADO will keep its members informed as the FY27 Appropriations process continues. The post President Trump Releases FY27 Budget Request appeared first on NADO.
Resource Page: ADA Requirements for Website Accessibility
In April 2024, the DOJ released a final rule implementing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for web-based government services provided by state and local governments. The post Resource Page: ADA Requirements for Website Accessibility appeared first on NADO.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="683" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/website-1024x683.png" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-32102" alt="" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/website-1024x683.png 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/website-300x200.png 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/website-768x512.png 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/website-391x260.png 391w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/website.png 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> Resource Page: ADA Requirements for Website Accessibility Updated April 2026 Understanding the 2024 DOJ Final Rule In April 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released a final rule implementing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for web-based government services provided by state and local governments. The rule establishes standards for web content accessibility based on the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA standard, issued in June 2018. The WCAG is a set of guidelines that outlines the parameters around web accessibility and is developed by the World Wide Web Consortium. The goal of the DOJ final rule is to ensure that online government services and resources including text, video, audio, website layout and design, future social media posts and documents hosted on a public entity’s website comply with the ADA. The rule applies to a wide range of online government services, including public notices, forms, digital applications, and video content. There are a few exceptions to the new standards for the following categories of web content: Archived web content Preexisting conventional electronic documents Web content posted by third parties on a county’s website Third-party web content linked from a county’s website Course content for specific students in public postsecondary institutions Class or course content for specific students in public elementary or secondary schools Conventional electronic documents related to specific individuals, their property, or their accounts, and are password-protected or secured Implementation costs are estimated to be in the tens of billions nationwide, creating significant challenges for small or resource-constrained public entities as compliance deadlines approach. However, DOJ has stated that compliance with the rule is only required to the extent that it does not result in provable “undue financial and administrative burdens.” September 2025 – DOJ Announced Plans to Issue NPRM On September 22 2025, DOJ announced plans in the federal register to issue a new Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to explore ways to lower the cost of compliance with its 2024 Final Rule on web-based accessibility requirements for state and local governments (public entities). While DOJ has not yet released a formal timeline for the new NPRM, the announcement comes as key compliance deadlines near: public entities, other than special district governments, serving populations of 50,000 or more must meet the new accessibility standards by April 24, 2026, while smaller entities and special district governments have until April 24, 2027. Update as of April 2026 With the first compliance deadline now less than a month away, the DOJ has not yet published a NPRM. NADO has compiled resources below to support operational and technical compliance with the rule. RESOURCES Fact Sheet: New Rule on the Accessibility of Web Content and Mobile Apps Provided by State and Local Governments (ADA) Accessibility of Web Content and Mobile Apps Provided by State and Local Government Entities: A Small Entity Compliance Guide New ADA Title II Rule on Web Accessibility: Fact Sheet Guide (Accessible.org) How to Meet WCAG (World Wide Web Consortium) This blog post provides general information about the DOJ’s final rule on web accessibility. It is not legal advice. Organizations should consult with legal counsel and accessibility experts for guidance specific to their circumstances. December 16, 2025 The post Resource Page: ADA Requirements for Website Accessibility appeared first on NADO.
The Future is Now: Data Center Fundamentals for EDD Staff
As counties, towns, and cities across the country explore how to manage new demand for data centers, Economic Development Districts (EDDs) can serve as important partners in the decision‑making process. The post The Future is Now: Data Center Fundamentals for EDD Staff appeared first on NADO.
The Future is Now: Data Center Fundamentals for EDD Staff As counties, towns, and cities across the country explore how to manage new demand for data centers, Economic Development Districts (EDDs) can serve as important partners in the decision‑making process. This report provides EDD staff with an overview of data center basics, the variety of local and regional impacts to consider, and the roles EDDs are increasingly playing as communities respond to data center development. In general, these roles revolve around advising local communities, convening regional conversations and planning efforts, offering zoning and land use guidance, providing grant‑writing expertise, and supporting workforce and training initiatives. Click here to explore the report (PDF). This resource is offered through the Economic Development District Community of Practice (EDD CoP), managed by the NADO Research Foundation to build the capacity of the national network of EDDs. To learn more, visit: www.nado.org/EDDCoP. The EDD CoP is made possible through an award from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (ED22HDQ3070106). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this resource are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Economic Development Administration or the U.S. Department of Commerce. The post The Future is Now: Data Center Fundamentals for EDD Staff appeared first on NADO.
Data Center Planning Resources for EDDs & RDOs
This resource page is intended for Economic Development Districts (EDDs) and Regional Development Organizations (RDOs) that are beginning to engage with data center development in their regions The post Data Center Planning Resources for EDDs & RDOs appeared first on NADO.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="227" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Picture2-1024x227.png" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-32316" alt="" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Picture2-1024x227.png 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Picture2-300x67.png 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Picture2-768x170.png 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Picture2-1536x341.png 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Picture2-2048x454.png 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> This resource page is intended for Economic Development Districts (EDDs) and Regional Development Organizations (RDOs) that are beginning to engage with data center development in their regions. It compiles reports, model ordinances, and policy analyses from a range of sources that address the planning, economic, and infrastructure considerations associated with data center siting and construction. A NADO Research Foundation brief will also be released soon to provide a more in-depth examination of the roles EDDs play in supporting regional responses to data center activity. Contact NADO Program Manager Dion Thompson-Davoli at dthompson-davoli@nado.org with any questions or to suggest additional resources to include on this page. Last Updated: March 19, 2026 Planning for Data Centers The Future of Data Centers (Brookings) This overview examines the data center landscape, including facility types, geographic distribution, financial investments, barriers to development, and workforce impacts. It covers critical challenges such as energy and water consumption, permitting, and electric grid investment needs. EDDs supporting local governments will find this useful as a primer on the industry’s scope and the infrastructure planning considerations that communities must navigate when working with local communities on data center projects. Turning the Data Center Boom into Long-Term, Local Prosperity (Brookings) This report argues that the AI-era data center buildout race is giving regions new leverage in data center negotiations, and that communities should treat siting decisions as ecosystem-shaping opportunities rather than isolated real estate transactions. It documents how the standard data center development model, characterized by speedy dealmaking and opaque negotiations, delivers short-term construction jobs but underwhelming long-term economic benefits relative to project sizes. EDDs can use this resource to help local governments understand their bargaining position and negotiate co-investments in workforce development, R&D partnerships, and regional technology ecosystems. Local Guidelines for Data Center Development (Urban Land Institute) This resource seeks to demystify data centers for local officials by describing key planning issues, including the lack of a uniform land-use category for data centers, sound mitigation, fire safety considerations, and site aesthetics. It also includes a comprehensive model zoning ordinance. EDDs can share this resource with local governments that need a practical roadmap for integrating data centers into their community planning and land use landscape. Getting It Right: Local Approaches to Data Center Development (Southern Environmental Law Center) This report provides guidance and best practices for local governments interested in increasing transparency and accountability around data center development. It explains options for how local zoning ordinances can empower governing bodies to address data centers in an informed and responsible way and includes examples of data center-specific development provisions from several localities. EDDs can use this to help communities understand the range of regulatory tools available to them. Data Centers and Their Energy Consumption (Congressional Research Service) This nonpartisan FAQ report from CRS documents that U.S. data centers account for approximately 4.4% of national energy consumption today, and projects that demand could double or triple by 2028. It covers data center energy basics including cooling strategies, water use, power utilization effectiveness metrics, and the current absence of binding federal energy standards for these facilities. EDDs helping communities evaluate data center proposals will find this a useful, politically neutral reference for understanding the energy and infrastructure demands these facilities bring. Data Centers are Coming. Here’s How Communities can Negotiate for Local Benefit. (Connect Humanity/Rio Grande Valley Broadband Coalition) Connect Humanity published this blog post after a workshop organized by the Rio Grande Valley Broadband Coalition in Pharr, Texas on ways to negotiate Public Benefit Agreements with data center developers. The post covers what communities should ask before offering incentives, what can actually be on the table in a negotiation with a data center developer, and where local leverage comes from in the negotiating process. The underlying argument is that communities have more bargaining power than they tend to realize and should use it before a project is already in motion. A simplified slide deck from the workshop is available as a PDF download. EDDs may find this useful for helping local governments think through negotiation strategy, particularly in regions without prior data center experience. What Rural Communities Need to Know About AI Data Centers (Rural Assembly/Radically Rural) This recorded webinar from Rural Assembly and Radically Rural covers many of the issues featured in other resources in this collection, but is oriented specifically toward rural practitioners and community members. It focuses on what’s actually known and disputed about data center impacts, the political landscape at the federal and state level, and the tools communities have to maintain local decision-making power. EDDs may find it useful as something to share with local officials or stakeholders who prefer a conversation format over a written guide. Data Centers in the Great Lakes Region (University of Virginia Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service) This study examines the economic, fiscal, and energy-related impacts of data centers across eight Great Lakes states, finding that data center energy demand will more than double in five of them as new facilities come online. It provides state-level fact sheets, a policymaker FAQ, and data on job creation, GDP contributions, and regional competitiveness. EDDs in the Great Lakes region and beyond can use this as a model for understanding the scale and implications of data center growth in their own areas and for communicating it to relevant stakeholders. Data Center Resource Webpage (Central Pines Regional Council) The Central Pines Regional Council, an Economic Development District in North Carolina, created this resource page to make information on data centers easily accessible to their communities and is a model for other regional organizations looking to do the same. It includes a ten page reference guide explaining the basics of data center design and resource use, as well as practical tips for local governments engaging with data center developers. The Economic Impacts of Data Centers Data Centers in Virginia (Virginia Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission) This legislative audit finds that data centers contribute 74,000 jobs, $5.5 billion in labor income, and $9.1 billion in GDP to Virginia’s economy annually and that they will be the primary driver of a projected doubling of statewide energy demand over the next decade. It includes legislative recommendations around utility authority, water use estimation requirements, and sound level standards for data center operations. Though aimed specifically at Virginia policymakers, it demonstrates the basic contours of data center economic impacts and includes valuable considerations that EDDs should keep in mind while modeling or discussing this issue. Policy Snapshot: Data Center Incentives (National Conference of State Legislatures) This snapshot provides an overview of the data center tax incentive landscape across the states. It finds that 37 states now offer some form of incentive program to attract data center investment and details the range of tools states use, including abatement types, levels, and triggers. EDDs can use this resource to help local governments understand the competitive environment for data center siting and the state-level policy context that shapes what communities can negotiate. Why Community Benefit Agreements Are Necessary for Data Centers (Brookings) This report makes the case for legally binding community benefit agreements (CBAs) as a tool for addressing growing public resistance to data center development related to electricity costs, water use, and environmental impacts. It recommends that CBAs include strong commitments for job creation, tax revenue, workforce training, and community being contributions, along with metric tracking and evaluation programs. EDDs can use this framework to help local governments develop transparent, enforceable agreements with data center developers. Preparing for Data Centers YouTube Series (PennFuture Media) This resource, produced by a Pennsylvania nonprofit, is a useful primer for EDD staff covering a variety of data center economic and resource considerations. Each of the six 10-15-minute-long videos discusses a distinct issue in an easy-to-follow, infographic-rich format. It may be useful for busy EDD staff looking for a quick and informative introduction to a range of data center topics. Federal and State Resources Reuse Considerations for Data Centers on Brownfield Sites (U.S. EPA) In accordance with the Executive Order on Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure, EPA’s Brownfields and Land Revitalization Program has assembled a set of guides and mapping tools to help brownfield stakeholders learn more about what to consider when evaluating whether a brownfield site can be redeveloped into a data center. The guides include resources that can be shared with local governments, in community planning processes, and to real estate partners and site marketers. Reuse Considerations for Data Centers on Superfund Sites (U.S. EPA) This page includes resources like those described in the link above but compiled by the EPA’s Superfund Redevelopment Program for superfund stakeholders. It includes a number of guides and mapping tools developed in response to the Executive Order that may be useful for EDDs or the communities they support when evaluating data center projects on superfund sites. Clean Air Act Resources for Data Centers (U.S. EPA) This page, assembled in accordance with the Executive Order on Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence, assembles information on Clean Air Act regulations, guidance, and technical tools that can assist with modeling, air quality permitting, and regulatory interpretations relevant for data centers and AI facilities. While more oriented towards a technical audience, it may help EDDs understand and share resources with their communities about the emissions impact of data centers, particularly those with on-site backup or primary power generation. Data Center Myth-Busting Reference Guide (Kansas Department of Commerce) This reference guide addresses ten common concerns about data center development that tend to surface in community opposition. It covers water consumption, utility rate impacts, noise, land use, grid stability, fiscal revenue, and broader economic effects, organized around a structured format that pairs each claim with sourced counterpoints and honest caveats about where community concerns are legitimate and where they may be overstated. Kansas-specific provisions make it especially useful for practitioners in that state, but most of the findings are generalizable to other context. EDDs working with local governments or stakeholders encountering data center proposals for the first time will find it a practical communication tool, particularly for public meetings and elected official briefings. Model Ordinances Zoning for Data Centers and Cryptocurrency Mining (American Planning Association) This report and model ordinance explores why communities may wish to define and regulate data centers and cryptocurrency mining as distinct uses in their zoning codes, providing a summary of contemporary approaches from across the country. It examines key planning issues including electricity and water use, noise production, safety and security needs, and low employment densities, and offers a series of questions to guide code drafting. EDDs working with local planners can use this as a starting point for thinking through how zoning codes should address these facilities. Data Center Model Ordinance (York County Planning Commission) This model ordinance from a Pennsylvania county planning commission provides detailed, adaptable language for municipalities to regulate data center development, including definitions, zoning district placement, site requirements, stormwater management, and environmental impact assessments. It addresses practical concerns like noise limits, riparian buffers, solar-ready rooftop design, and consistency with comprehensive plans. EDDs can share this as a concrete example that local governments can adapt to their own planning contexts. Local Guidelines for Data Center Development (Urban Land Institute) This resource includes a model zoning ordinance for local governments that addresses a comprehensive set of land use considerations for data center development. EDDs can share this as a flexible tool that local governments can adapt to their own planning contexts. Local Ordinances to Help Bring Data Centers into Alignment with Climate Goals (Georgetown Climate Center) This memo identifies model ordinance language that local governments can adopt to keep data center development on track with their climate and environmental goals without forgoing the potential economic benefits. It addresses conditions around clean energy requirements, emissions limits, and siting permits, and suggests tiered financial incentives for data centers that commit to using low-carbon technologies. EDDs working with communities that have sustainability goals will find this resource especially useful for balancing economic development with environmental priorities. This resource is offered through the Economic Development District Community of Practice (EDD CoP), managed by the NADO Research Foundation to build the capacity of the national network of EDDs. To learn more, visit: www.nado.org/EDDCoP. The EDD CoP is made possible through an award from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (ED22HDQ3070106). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this resource are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Economic Development Administration or the U.S. Department of Commerce. The views and opinions expressed by other organizations or outside publications referenced in this resource guide do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of the National Association of Development Organizations or its members. The post Data Center Planning Resources for EDDs & RDOs appeared first on NADO.
Chicken Before the Egg: How Central Virginia Poultry Farmers Turned a Crisis into a Cooperative
In March 2023, Tyson Foods announced the closure of its Glen Allen, Virginia facility, leaving hundreds of local poultry growers and their 265 farmer‑owned production houses without long‑standing contracts. This case study examines how a broad coalition of regional partners, including the Commonwealth Regional Council (CRC), the area’s Economic Development District (EDD), mobilized to respond and chart a path forward. The post Chicken Before the Egg: How Central Virginia Poultry Farmers Turned a Crisis into a Cooperative appeared first on NADO.
Chicken Before the Egg: How Central Virginia Poultry Farmers Turned a Crisis into a Cooperative <img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="791" height="1024" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Central-VA-Poultry-Case-Study_Cover-Page-791x1024.png" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-32299" alt="" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Central-VA-Poultry-Case-Study_Cover-Page-791x1024.png 791w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Central-VA-Poultry-Case-Study_Cover-Page-232x300.png 232w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Central-VA-Poultry-Case-Study_Cover-Page-768x994.png 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Central-VA-Poultry-Case-Study_Cover-Page-1187x1536.png 1187w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Central-VA-Poultry-Case-Study_Cover-Page.png 1545w" sizes="(max-width: 791px) 100vw, 791px" /> In March 2023, Tyson Foods announced the closure of its Glen Allen, Virginia facility, leaving hundreds of local poultry growers and their 265 farmer‑owned production houses without long‑standing contracts. This case study examines how a broad coalition of regional partners, including the Commonwealth Regional Council (CRC), the area’s Economic Development District (EDD), mobilized to respond and chart a path forward. Through coordinated planning, fundraising, and technical assistance, the region ultimately launched the Central Virginia Poultry Cooperative, a farmer‑owned cooperative that secured a 13‑year agreement to supply eggs to an organic egg producer in Indiana. The cooperative not only preserved the region’s poultry industry but has also positioned it for future growth. Click here to read the case study (PDF). This resource is offered through the Economic Development District Community of Practice (EDD CoP), managed by the NADO Research Foundation to build the capacity of the national network of EDDs. To learn more, visit: www.nado.org/EDDCoP. The EDD CoP is made possible through an award from the U.S. Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (ED22HDQ3070106). The statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations in this resource are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Economic Development Administration or the U.S. Department of Commerce. The post Chicken Before the Egg: How Central Virginia Poultry Farmers Turned a Crisis into a Cooperative appeared first on NADO.
What NADO Members Need to Know About the FY27 Appropriations Process: Programmatic Requests & Community Project Funding
What NADO Members Need to Know About the FY27 Appropriations Process: Programmatic Requests & Community Project Funding Updated March 20, 2026. As Congress kicks off the Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) appropriations cycle, Regional Development Organizations (RDOs) have important opportunities to shape federal investment in their communities and beyond. On February 25th, the House Appropriations Committee […] The post What NADO Members Need to Know About the FY27 Appropriations Process: Programmatic Requests & Community Project Funding appeared first on NADO.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Untitled-design-3-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-32344" alt="" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Untitled-design-3-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Untitled-design-3-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Untitled-design-3-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Untitled-design-3-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Untitled-design-3.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> What NADO Members Need to Know About the FY27 Appropriations Process: Programmatic Requests & Community Project Funding Updated March 20, 2026. As Congress kicks off the Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) appropriations cycle, Regional Development Organizations (RDOs) have important opportunities to shape federal investment in their communities and beyond. On February 25th, the House Appropriations Committee opened its electronic portal for FY27 earmark requests for House members, allowing them to submit programmatic, language, and Community Project Funding (also known as earmarks) requests on behalf of their constituents. Please see the Committee’s published guidance and resources HERE. On March 18th, U.S. Senators Susan Collins and Patty Murray, Chair and Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, released guidance for Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 programmatic, language, and Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) requests. Read the guidance HERE. Some, but not all, Senate offices have begun accepting earmark (also known as Congressionally Directed Spending) as well as programmatic and language requests. This post summarizes the key updates, deadlines, and practical steps RDOs should take now to prepare for FY27. BACKGROUND What are programmatic, language, and community project funding requests? Programmatic Requests: Members may submit a request to fund a specific program or activity in the bill at a specified level. Ex. $110 million for the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration (EDA) Partnership Planning Program in FY 2027, the level authorized under the Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024. Language Requests: Members may submit a request to include specific bill or report language that does not direct funding to a particular entity but encourages, urges, or directs some type of action. Ex. The Committee recognizes the vital role of Economic Development Districts in facilitating regional economic competitiveness and directs EDA to ensure that planning funds are sufficient to support at least two full‑time professional staff per district. Community Project Funding Requests: Members may submit a request to fund specific projects in their communities, so long as the projects have a federal nexus and meet other requirements established by federal law, House Rules, and the Committee to ensure only high-quality projects are requested and funded. See a list of projects from FY26 HERE. FY27 UPDATES For FY27, House members are only able to submit 20 of their own requests across the 8 appropriations bills that include Community Project Funding (outlined below). Senate members are able to submit 25 requests for Agriculture, Rural Development, FDA, and Related Agencies, 35 for Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies, 40 for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, 65 for Labor, HHS, Education, and Related Agencies, and 65 for Transportation, HUD, and Related Agencies. Additionally, the House is reopening the Labor-HHS account for Community Project Funding requests. Specifically, the House is accepting requests for funding through HHS’ Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) for “HRSA-Wide Activities and Program Support.” Funding is generally reserved for health facilities construction and equipment. DEADLINES FOR FUNDING REQUESTS Deadlines for each House Appropriations subcommittee are as follows: Friday, March 13th: Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration Commerce, Justice, and Science Financial Services and General Government (Programmatic and language requests only) Legislative Branch (Programmatic and language requests only) Military Construction and Veterans Affairs National Security and Department of State (Programmatic and language requests only) Friday, March 20th: Defense (Programmatic and language requests only) Energy and Water Development Homeland Security Interior and Environment Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Transportation and Housing and Urban Development Deadlines for each Senate Appropriations subcommittee are as follows: Subcommittee CDS Requests Programmatic Requests Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Related Agencies April 7, 2026 April 14, 2026 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies April 9, 2026 April 14, 2026 Defense (not accepting CDS requests) N/A May 12, 2026 Energy and Water Development April 16, 2026 April 16, 2026 Financial Services and General Government April 15, 2026 April 15, 2026 Homeland Security April 16, 2026 April 16, 2026 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies April 15, 2026 April 15, 2026 Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), Education, and Related Agencies April 21, 2026 April 21, 2026 Legislative Branch (not accepting CDS requests) N/A April 1, 2026 Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies April 28, 2026 April 28, 2026 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs (not accepting CDS requests) N/A April 30, 2026 Transportation, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Related Agencies April 20, 2026 April 20, 2026 Please note these are NOT the deadlines for individual offices. Please see your representative’s website for their specified deadline. STEPS TO TAKE FOR COMMUNITY PROJECT REQUESTS (HOUSE REQUESTS ONLY) Consult the Community Project Funding (CPF) request guidance. Available HERE. Determine where your project falls within eligible accounts. A list of eligible accounts is available HERE. Consult the applicable subcommittee guidance for that account linked HERE. To submit, visit your representative’s website to see if they posted their CPF request forms; if you don’t see them, call your office. STEPS TO TAKE FOR PROGRAMMATIC AND LANGUAGE REQUESTS (HOUSE REQUESTS ONLY) Consult the programmatic and language request guidance. Available HERE. Take a look at NADO’s advocacy resources for ideas HERE. To submit, visit your representative’s website to see if they posted their programmatic and language request forms; if you don’t see them, call your office. For Senate Requests, some senators have begun to post their guidance for Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) and programmatic and language requests. Please see your senator’s website to determine if they have opened up submissions. NADO will continue to monitor the FY27 appropriations process and will keep members informed of any programmatic or language requests submitted on behalf of our members. March 6, 2026 The post What NADO Members Need to Know About the FY27 Appropriations Process: Programmatic Requests & Community Project Funding appeared first on NADO.
House Agriculture Committee Introduces 2026 Farm Bill: Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
On February 13th, House Agriculture Committee Chairman G.T. Thompson (R-PA) introduced the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, which would reauthorize the Farm Bill. The House Agriculture Committee is expected to mark up the bill on February 23rd. The post House Agriculture Committee Introduces 2026 Farm Bill: Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 appeared first on NADO.
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="576" src="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Untitled-design-1-1024x576.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-32268" alt="" srcset="https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Untitled-design-1-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Untitled-design-1-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Untitled-design-1-768x432.jpg 768w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Untitled-design-1-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Untitled-design-1.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /> House Agriculture Committee Introduces 2026 Farm Bill: Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 On February 13th, House Agriculture Committee Chairman G.T. Thompson (R-PA) introduced the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026, which would reauthorize the Farm Bill. The House Agriculture Committee is expected to mark up the bill on February 23rd. Read the committee’s summary HERE. Read the full bill text HERE. BACKGROUND The U.S. Farm Bill is a legislative package that shapes federal policy on a wide swath of issues including agriculture, nutrition assistance, rural development, conservation, community development, land stewardship, and infrastructure investment. The Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018, the most recent Farm Bill, was originally set to expire in 2023; however, after negotiations in Congress stalled, it received a series of short-term extensions and is now funded at existing levels through September 30, 2026. In 2025, Congress passed H.R. 1, which included several measures traditionally addressed during Farm Bill reauthorization. Click HERE for more information on the measures included in H.R.1. RURAL PROVISIONS INCLUDED IN INTRODUCED BILL The House version of the Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 continues support for rural development initiatives. Provisions benefitting rural communities are outlined below: Strengthens broadband connectivity to rural communities through including $350 million per year for five years for the ReConnect Rural Broadband Program. Encourages private capital investments in rural communities through existing rural development business and cooperative programs including $25 million per year for five years for the Intermediary Relending Program. Invests in and strengthens rural water infrastructure through reauthorizing the Water, Waste Disposal, and Wastewater Facility Grants Program at $15 million per year for five years and the Solid Waste Management Grants Program at $10 million per year for five years. Directs USDA to provide technical assistance and capacity building support to counties and other local partners to enhance access to rural development programs in underserved and distressed areas. Expands access to the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP) through a program delivery pilot that prioritizes rural communities. Establishes a standing authority to deliver ad hoc disaster assistance via block grant to States. Addresses existing workforce challenges within rural communities to effectively meet their needs through reauthorizing the Rural Innovation Stronger Economy (RISE) Grant Program at $10 million per year for five years. Allows Farm Credit institutions to partner with community banks and other lenders in financing essential community facilities in rural areas Protects access to health care in rural America through codifying the Rural Hospital Technical Assistance Program. Enhances efforts to meet the childcare demands of rural areas through establishing a three-year rural childcare initiative. Codifies the Rural Development Innovation Center. WHAT’S NEXT? House Agriculture Committee leaders are aiming to bring the Farm Bill to the House floor before the Easter recess (beginning on March 28th), contingent on the Farm, Food, and National Security Act advancing through Committee on schedule. Meanwhile, the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry has not yet signaled when it plans to introduce or take up its version of the 2026 Farm Bill. Significant challenges still lie ahead before a final Farm Bill can be enacted prior to the expiration of the 2018 Farm Bill on September 30, 2026. A number of factors may continue to slow progress, including narrow majorities in both chambers, partisan disputes over provisions carried over from H.R. 1, and heightened political tensions heading into the 2026 midterm elections. NADO will keep our members updated on any developments to this critical piece of legislation. February 18, 2026 The post House Agriculture Committee Introduces 2026 Farm Bill: Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 appeared first on NADO.